Misplaced Pages

User talk:AlexCovarrubias

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by AlexCovarrubias (talk | contribs) at 18:59, 5 March 2007. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 18:59, 5 March 2007 by AlexCovarrubias (talk | contribs)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

IN LOVING MEMORY OF CLAUDIA HERNÁNDEZ
(1982-2007)
You will always be in my heart

I don't have the time and I'm not in the mood for discussions. I lost a very special person just 1 day ago. I will be absent from editing or creating new articles since I'm very sad and kinda depressed. If I don't reply soon is because of this. Thanks.


Message

Man I'm very sorry for your lost, sometimes is funny how life is, isn't it, a couple of hours ago, we were laughing and now, you're devastated by the death of one of your relatives (I'm guessing), anyways, I'll sure keep an eye on that discussion, hope you'll be back soon, take care bro, peace out. Supaman89 01:54, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
My condolences to you, my friend. Hari Seldon 17:52, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
I am deeply sorry for your loss.
About Mesoamérica, I was frustrated with the whole discussion and continuous reverts on Middle America (disambiguation), and I was afraid we were heading towards another edit war, and I spoke hastily to Corticopia. What I meant, is that there are two points of view (POV) which can be backed up with sources. I had the impression that both of you were trying to overrule the each other arguments with sources, where a middle ground could have been found. Moreover, I believe that sources should be classified or qualified: not all sources are equally valid, and one source versus a million sources will probably be best qualified as "infrequently this is the case". That was my issue with Mesoamerica. The geopolitical use of the term, while valid and sourced, is infrequent, in that Mesoamerica is an anthropological term first, and then a geopolitical term. By not using "qualifiers" (or adjectives) we give the impression that both definitions are equally used in synonymity.
--theDúnadan 17:58, 4 March 2007 (UTC)