Misplaced Pages

User talk:97.112.207.221

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Yamla (talk | contribs) at 13:06, 27 December 2022 (→Unblock request too: Decline completely inappropriate unblock request). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 13:06, 27 December 2022 by Yamla (talk | contribs) (→Unblock request too: Decline completely inappropriate unblock request)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Multi-user iconThis account is a suspected sockpuppet of Kompress0 (talk · contribs · logs) and has been blocked indefinitely.
Please refer to the sockpuppet investigation of the sockpuppeteer, and editing habits or contributions of the sockpuppet for evidence. This policy subsection may be helpful.
Account information: block log – contribs – logs – abuse log – CentralAuth		This account is a suspected sockpuppet

Unblock request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

97.112.207.221 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Yeah I was only ever blocked because of bias in favor of a few spiteful registered users. I'd really appreciate being unblocked so I can go about being a constructive editor. 97.112.207.221 (talk) 04:19, 27 December 2022 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Requests with personal attacks are not considered. Also WP:NOTTHEM. 331dot (talk) 08:19, 27 December 2022 (UTC)

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You didn't have this "aw, shucks... I just wanna be a good guy making good edits" attitude when you posted this unblock request on another account, only a matter of hours ago. That, right after another daily bout of evasion, harrassment & disruption using the various IPs at your disposal. This is in keeping with your threat to continue stalking Jacona and I, to somehow force us to give in to your edit demands. I'm sure in one of your blocks an admin suggested the 6 month offer, and if not, it'll probably come up sooner or later. You should consider it. (jmho) - wolf 07:06, 27 December 2022 (UTC)
Or, hear me out, you could just leave my very valid edits TF alone and we can all go about our business and save tons of time.

Unblock request too

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

97.112.207.221 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

"Also WP:NOTTHEM." But it IS them, I'm not going to lie and pretend it's not. You should really respect and appreciate the fact that I'm still here telling the truth instead of just saying what admins want to hear to remove my ban. This started on the Flint River Academy and RAS Syndrome pages. I left those pages alone after a few minor edit wars and went on to make constructive edits, IE adding a popular culture reference to the mosquitofish page (Which was approved by C. Fred directly by the way) but was removed out of spite by Jacona who stalked me over there and whose side was taken there as well DESPITE my edit being in good faith and validly sourced. If you check her contributions page you'll notice she's unnervingly obsessed with segregation academies. I feel she reverted my edit not in good faith but out of racism. 97.112.207.221 (talk) 12:55, 27 December 2022 (UTC)

Decline reason:

This is a completely inappropriate unblock request. Yamla (talk) 13:06, 27 December 2022 (UTC)

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

User infoThis is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.
Category: