Misplaced Pages

:Articles for deletion/Gelf Darkhearth - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 21:45, 6 February 2023 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

Revision as of 21:45, 6 February 2023 by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12))(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete --JForget 00:55, 6 March 2008 (UTC)

Gelf Darkhearth

Gelf Darkhearth (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Non notable Dungeons & Dragons deity, appearing briefly in a single supplement. As far as I know, and as far as the article states, mentioned no where else. No evidence of third party coverage. J Milburn (talk) 18:50, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

Delete Fails WP:N. ArcAngel (talk) 19:45, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

Delete Non-notable. March is D&D Spring Cleaning Month; you can help. Cheers, Jack Merridew 08:18, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

Keep Notable fictional deity passes WP:N. Consistent with a specizalized encyclopedia on Dungeons & Dragons deities. Sincerely, --Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles 16:16, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

Delete Unnotable fictional character which fails WP:N. Inconsistent with an encyclopaedia and belongs instead on a specialised fan wikia. Eusebeus (talk) 17:45, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

Not currently; I have seen material from the D&D Wiki and can confirm that it allows homebrewed material. -Jéské 18:50, 3 March 2008 (UTC)


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.