This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 00:32, 7 February 2023 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
Revision as of 00:32, 7 February 2023 by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12))(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was Keep (No consensus). --Ryan Delaney 02:14, 24 August 2005 (UTC)
Harry Potter RPGs
- Do we really need an article on every kind of message board role-playing game or collaborative fan fiction project? Not notable outside of their own communities. Delete. -Sean Curtin 05:45, August 14, 2005 (UTC)
- Delete fanfic, collaborative or otherwise. Heh...I just nominated the same thing in my fandom for VFD just now, too. - A Man In Black (Talk | Contribs) 06:41, 14 August 2005 (UTC)
- Keep, individual pieces of fanfic may not be notable, but whole genres of it are. Kappa 08:14, 14 August 2005 (UTC)
- You're right. This genre of fanfic is described nicely in Message board role-playing game, an encyclopedic article (that could probably do with a little improvement, but I'm a perfectionist). The Harry Potter article adds nothing not already mentioned in that article. - A Man In Black (Talk | Contribs) 13:25, 14 August 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. We most certainly do not need more Harry Potter articles. / Peter 10:26, 14 August 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. Comparatively well written but very pointless, as noted.Sandstein 11:01, 14 August 2005 (UTC)
- Delete, per Gtrmp. Nandesuka 12:19, 14 August 2005 (UTC)
- Weak keep Whilst I personally don't see the point as per Peter, the best point is made by Kappa. --Lomedae 12:53, August 14, 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. --*drew 14:05, 14 August 2005 (UTC)
- Delete, per User:A Man In Black. --Calton | Talk 14:13, August 14, 2005 (UTC)
- Delete non-encyc. We've enough cruft here already to re-cruft a whole de-crufted thing. -Splash 16:14, 14 August 2005 (UTC)
- Cruft cruft cruft cruft. Lovely cruft! Wonderful cruft! Cruft cru-u-u-u-u-uft cruft cru-u-u-u-u-uft cruft. Lovely cruft! Lovely cruft! Lovely cruft! Lovely cruft! Lovely cruft! Cruft cruft cruft cruft! - A Man In Black (Talk | Contribs) 16:41, 14 August 2005 (UTC)
- Delete no verifiability outside of the websites themselves. No impact on the world outside of their own communities. Friday (talk) 17:57, 14 August 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. WP:N, WP:V. Friday hits it spot on.—Encephalon | ζ | Σ 22:00:45, 2005-08-14 (UTC)
- weak keep Fanfiction is good but that is the only reason to keep it - Aeon 00:58, 15 August 2005 (UTC)
- Delete as per cruft vikings. Hamster Sandwich 01:12, 15 August 2005 (UTC)
- Keep. Notable. — BRIAN0918 • 2005-08-15 02:48
- Keep, per Kappa. Sjakkalle (Check!) 08:46, 15 August 2005 (UTC)
- Crappy, really useless fan trivia. Delete. Proto t c 10:20, 15 August 2005 (UTC)
- Keep Well...it does state the obvious at the moment, but the topic is notable. Sam Vimes 12:46, 18 August 2005 (UTC)
- Keep, Perhaps it needs to be part of a larger article on the cultural phenomenon of Harry Potter thus joining several of these types of pages together. --Gearspring 00:06, 19 August 2005 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.