Misplaced Pages

:Articles for deletion/Johnny Lee Clary - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 07:18, 7 February 2023 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

Revision as of 07:18, 7 February 2023 by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12))(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Snowball delete. Tawker 05:25, 4 May 2006 (UTC)

Johnny Lee Clary

Sorry but just because you do not like someone, that does not give anyone the right to delete information pages about that person, especially when they are a public figure that is in history. That is what Wickipedia is all about. TheKingOfDixie Non-notable hagiographic autobiography with no incoming links; see also Misplaced Pages:Requests for comment/TheKingOfDixie FRCP11 17:23, 1 May 2006 (UTC)

comment as you created this article and created it about yourself, it is understandable that you would want to keep it. What is not understandable, nor tolerable, is for you to make personal attacks to and about others on Misplaced Pages.IrishGuy 18:54, 2 May 2006 (UTC)
comment TheKingOfDixie has already attempted to alter this vote by removing comments he doesn't like. Check the history. IrishGuy 07:11, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
comment Link to vandalism by TKOD on this page. Is there an administrator here? Why isn't this sort of vandalism grounds for an immediate block? We have a user who has never contributed anything positive, and regularly violates just about every Misplaced Pages rule and convention. -- FRCP11 14:08, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete How appropriate that I get to vote right after my arch nemisis TheKing :) j/k I am actually VERY surprised that he even came here to vote, go figure.Tom 21:26, 2 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete 'Borderline' is the best description I've seen. The article is vanity. Shenme 02:01, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. This article is not written in an unencyclopedic fashion, suffering from the usual autobio problems: OR and POV. Someday, someone might write such a biography but they should start from a clean slate. Thanks to FRCP11 for nominating this, I've had the article on my watchlist for months waiting for this day. -Will Beback 08:02, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete, poorly written vanity article. quadratic 05:04, 4 May 2006 (UTC)


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.