Misplaced Pages

:Articles for deletion/Shonkhobash - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 13:25, 11 February 2023 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

Revision as of 13:25, 11 February 2023 by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12))(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. T. Canens (talk) 01:00, 11 June 2013 (UTC)

Shonkhobash

Shonkhobash (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article is on a Bengali little magazine, I have searched in Google (English and Bengali) but can not find many sources writing about this journal. According to the article the journal started publishing in 2009. Since this is not that old, I hoped to see more reliable sources. They have added a wordpress blog as official site. The Facebook page has 130 likes. In short, I am unsure if it is a notable magazine! Tito Dutta (contact) 17:23, 16 May 2013 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:33, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:33, 16 May 2013 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Michaelzeng7 (talk) 00:49, 23 May 2013 (UTC)


Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar · · 15:27, 30 May 2013 (UTC)

This isn't an appropriate rationale. In fact, it's copied almost verbatim from what User:Titodutta suggested you would have to bring to the article in order to keep it. At this point, we need reliable, third-party published sources establishing the importance of this subject. Woodroar (talk) 13:41, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
I'm sorry, but we're looking for reliable, third-party published sources. Directories such as Yellow Pages are essentially user submitted: they may show that something exists—although they really don't, because all an entry means is that someone paid to list their business—but not that they are notable. We're looking for sources like major newspapers, journals, and books written about the subject, not just a one-sentence mention on a blog. Woodroar (talk) 01:10, 3 June 2013 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.