Misplaced Pages

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 15:44, 11 February 2023 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Tikiwont (talk) 08:42, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

South park animals

South park animals (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

In-universe list for which I can see no use. Was tagged for speedy, but does not meet any of the criteria. J Milburn (talk) 22:13, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

• Delete Indiscriminate and unsourced information, full of original research ("Kevin may or may not be an animal"), difficult to verify, in-universe... you name it. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • 22:19, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

• Delete - Fancruft. Blaxthos ( t / c ) 22:29, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
  • "Cruft" is never a good argument per Misplaced Pages:ITSCRUFT, , and Misplaced Pages:Cruftcruft. Best, --Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles 03:07, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
• Delete - Original research. Cambrasa (talk) 00:21, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

• Delete - per above. --Starionwolf (talk) 01:03, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
  • per votes are generally considered weak. Sincerely, --Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles 03:07, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
• Keep as acceptable and discrminate spinoff article and subarticle of notable franchise that can easily be verfied. Sincerely, --Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles 03:07, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
• Delete, original research, fancruft, indiscriminate list. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 04:39, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional characters-related deletion discussions. —Pixelface (talk) 04:43, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. —Pixelface (talk) 04:43, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
• Keep but move to South Park animals (note capitalization) Appears to be in the vein of South Park characters; the tone is a bit OR-ish (e.g. Kevin), but episodes of the show itself could be used as sources for most of it. JeremyMcCracken (talk) 04:53, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
• Delete per TenPoundHammer. Masterpiece2000 (talk) 04:55, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
• Delete as WP:OR. -WarthogDemon 04:56, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
• Delete - original research, little context and no sources. Think outside the box 14:41, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
• Delete as above, no context or reliable third party publications about the subject. (jarbarf) (talk) 16:48, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.