This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 16:30, 27 February 2023 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
Revision as of 16:30, 27 February 2023 by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12))(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Singularity 17:13, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
Zachary Levenson
- Zachary Levenson (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Non-notable, unreferenced, contains non-encyclopaedic info that may be nonsense. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 05:36, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
- Delete, WP:NN. Esradekan Gibb 05:51, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
- Delete, no evidence of notability per WP:BIO. Scant presence online seems to be an indicator of a lack of "prominence" as suggested in article, a few published papers here and there, but nothing to meet WP:PROFTEST. Might well be a joke. --Kinu /c 06:35, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
- Delete, No references and fails notability. Artene50 (talk) 07:35, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
- Delete, there are no evidences of notability per WP:BIO. Shovon (talk) 07:49, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
- Delete as non-notable and unreferenced. Alexius08 is welcome to talk about his contributions. 09:55, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
- Delete per above. JJL (talk) 13:54, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
- Delete. Possibly the same as the Zachary Levenson described in this blogger profile, a student living in Berkeley after previously living in Richmond, VA, and Manhattan? From the timing, I'm guessing his time at Columbia U. was as an undergrad there and that he is now a grad student at Berkeley. In any case delete as non-notable, un-referenced, and in part (the alligator) likely untrue. —David Eppstein (talk) 14:06, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
- Delete. Aside from what has already been stated, the lack of sources in this article is a WP:BLP issue. Coccyx Bloccyx (talk) 16:07, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
- Delete per WP:N and WP:BLP. There isn't any given information to argue why Mr. Levenson is more important than my high school biology teacher.... Happyme22 (talk) 23:24, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
- Delete. If somebody's only claim to importance is signing a petition and having a pet alligator...well, this should have been speedied already. KleenupKrew (talk) 01:00, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
- A couple of speedy deletes ( ) have been tried already but overturned by other editors. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 01:36, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.