Misplaced Pages

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 09:46, 1 March 2023 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Arbitrarily0  13:10, 30 December 2009 (UTC)

Obsession within Frankenstein

Obsession within Frankenstein (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Quite simple really. With all due respect to the author, it's an essay, consisting of pure original research, therefore not acceptable for Misplaced Pages. I wish there was a csd for these things... Lord Spongefrog, (I am Czar of all Russias!) 21:10, 23 December 2009 (UTC)

• Delete: Essay. Joe Chill (talk) 21:13, 23 December 2009 (UTC)
• Delete. Who are you trying to get crazy with essay? JBsupreme (talk) 23:14, 23 December 2009 (UTC)
• Delete WP:NOT#ESSAY and OR indeed. Mainly WP:PLOT and uses an unreliable source, http://www.helium.com/items/1205645-book-reviews-frankenstein-by-mary-shelley Шизомби (talk) 01:21, 24 December 2009 (UTC)
• Delete - Essay, fails WP:NOT#ESSAY. December21st2012Freak 21:42, 24 December 2009 (UTC)
• Obvious delete -- an essay, or something someone learned in class one day. --EEMIV (talk) 22:38, 28 December 2009 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.