Misplaced Pages

User:Enkyo2

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 08:45, 2 March 2023 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

Revision as of 08:45, 2 March 2023 by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12))(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff) Misplaced Pages editor
This is a Wikipedia user page.
This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user whom this page is about may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia. The original page is located at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Enkyo2.


This user helped bring 2010 G-20 Toronto summit to Good Article status on August 23, 2011
Two rakan -- only one focal point
Enkyo (延慶) = becoming prolonged


My username is derived from Enkyo (延慶), which was a Japanese era name (年号,, nengō,, lit. "year name") in the Kamakura period after Tokuji and before Ōchō. This time frame spanned the years from October 1308 through April 1311. The reigning emperor was Hanazono-tennō (花園天皇)

ウィキペディアは弱肉強食の社会ではない。論争の時、英語のコミュニケーションの問題を考えてください。喧嘩の思いをおいて、他のユーザーに丁寧に頼むほうがいい


Ground-breaking (Himorogi)

The pyramid graphic posted at WP:DR is the only image on the page. The specific wording of the pyramid graphic makes it helpful. The graphic suggests a hierarchy among common argument strategies:

  1. Refuting the Central Point refutes the central point
  2. Refutation finds the mistake and explains why its mistaken using quotes
  3. Counterargument contradicts and then backs it up with reasoning and/or supporting evidence
  4. Contradiction states the opposing case with little or no supporting evidence
  5. Responding to Tone criticizes the tone of the writing without addressing the substance of the argument
  6. Ad Hominem attacks the characteristics or authority of the writer without addressing the substance of the argument
  7. Name calling sounds something like, "You are an ass hat."

At WP:DR, the image caption is an hortatory command: "Stay in the top three sections of this pyramid."