This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Lowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs) at 01:19, 18 March 2023 (Archiving 2 discussion(s) to Talk:Macroeconomics/Archive 1) (bot). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 01:19, 18 March 2023 by Lowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs) (Archiving 2 discussion(s) to Talk:Macroeconomics/Archive 1) (bot)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Macroeconomics article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 3 months |
This article has not yet been rated on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
{{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
{{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
{{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
Comment by 80.161.140.17
Four-rate formula and Exchange-rate Formula?
Four-rate formula explains the mathematical relation of change rate in price, wage, interest rate and GDP (or GNP).
Exchange rate reqlll8888888888formula help to calculate exchange rate between different money with different productivity.
This book introduces a new theory of price system and a general theory of interest rate.
Please read a new mook:
THING AND ITS LAW, Chapter 3: Productive force ( the theory of price system)ISBN 1-58939-525-5. Published 2003 by Virtualbookworm.com Publishing Inc.
xiaozhong zhai
Comment by 203.146.108.8
People who edit this page should know something about economics. Do you think that Lucas would have received the nobel prize for simply a suggesting?
Furthermore, New Keysian economics does not provide strong micro foundations to Keysian economics.
Also, these so called schools of economic thought have no bearing on relevant macroeconomics and are very outdated and not used by anyone who knows economics anymore.
Short-run link
I know nothing about economics, but it's not clear to me that link to short-run links to the correct article. It doesn't seem related.
Dr. Dai's comment on this article
Dr. Dai has reviewed this Misplaced Pages page, and provided us with the following comments to improve its quality:
1) "The IS–LM model represents the equilibrium in interest rates and output given by the equilibrium in the goods and money markets"
to be replaced by "The IS–LM model represents all the combinations of interest rates and output that ensure the equilibrium in the goods and money markets"
2) "Banks continuously shift the money supply ..." to be changed to "Central banks continuously shift the money supply... "
3) "Some banks allow the interest rate to fluctuate " to be changed to "Some of them allow the interest rate to fluctuate "
4) "implement quantitative easing by buying other assets such as corporate bonds," to be changed as "can implement quantitative easing by buying not only government bonds, but also other assets such as corporate bonds,"
5) "The rigidity of new Keynesian theory" to be replaced by
"The nominal rigidity of new Keynesian theory"
We hope Wikipedians on this talk page can take advantage of these comments and improve the quality of the article accordingly.
Dr. Dai has published scholarly research which seems to be relevant to this Misplaced Pages article:
- Reference : Dai, Meixing, 2009. "On the role of money growth targeting under inflation targeting regime," MPRA Paper 13780, University Library of Munich, Germany.
ExpertIdeasBot (talk) 18:29, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
Here we go again..
What's the point of citing a criticism of macroeconomics in the lead? Right in the beginning it reads,
"evidence regarding the consequences of different macroeconomic policies is still highly imperfect and open to serious criticism."
You know that there are few areas of research that are not open to 'serious criticism'? The whole point of scholarship is that ideas are open to criticism, and knowledge improves by a process of critical analysis. History, sociology, even the natural sciences function this way.
Actually this line is very much in the tradition of certain Misplaced Pages editors going out of their way to single out the discipline of economics as an illegitimate or questionable field of inquiry. There's no problem on here citing other controversial areas of research as fact, but there is certainly a crusade against economics. If it were just an article or two it wouldn't be worth addressing, but this is a reoccurring theme in the economics space.
If you really can't resist criticizing macroeconomics, and you have a sufficient number of reliable sources critiquing it in this way (not just one or two), why not just add a criticism section? The lead is supposed to summarize the main body of the article, and currently there is no section that critiques macroeconomics in this article.Jonathan f1 (talk) 01:27, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
India Education Program course assignment
This article was the subject of an educational assignment at Symbiosis School of Economics supported by Misplaced Pages Ambassadors through the India Education Program during the 2011 Q3 term. Further details are available on the course page.
The above message was substituted from {{IEP assignment}}
by PrimeBOT (talk) on 19:56, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
Modern Monetary Theory
Why is their no mention of MMT in this article about macro economics? MMT is an important theoretical framework for understanding macro econ. We should at least link to the substantial MMT page in the See Also section, if not devote a section of this article to it. UberFefa (talk) 15:42, 17 March 2023 (UTC)
Categories:- All unassessed articles
- C-Class WikiProject Business articles
- Top-importance WikiProject Business articles
- WikiProject Business articles
- C-Class Economics articles
- Top-importance Economics articles
- WikiProject Economics articles
- C-Class Globalization articles
- Top-importance Globalization articles
- C-Class Trade articles
- Top-importance Trade articles
- WikiProject Trade articles
- India Education Program student projects, 2011 Q3
- India Education Program student projects