This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Betacommand (talk | contribs) at 03:12, 16 March 2007 (→[]). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 03:12, 16 March 2007 by Betacommand (talk | contribs) (→[])(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)| < March 15 | Deletion review archives: 2007 March | March 17 > |
|---|
16 March 2007
Renetto
- Renetto (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (restore|AfD|2nd AfD)
This Youtube celebrity's stub was created with full assertation of notability stating "His videos have attracted 1.19 million views, plus over 23,000 subscribers." This article was fully referenced by The New York Times and The Wall Street Journal. Within one minute of the stub's creation, user:ScorpO speedy deleted it. The user stated on my talk page: "As much attention as renetto may gain on youtube I do not feel he is notable enough to have an article about him." This article was in no way proper criteria for speedy deletion and the reason the user gave for the deletion was purely WP:IDONTLIKEIT. --Oakshade 02:29, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
- Don't get me wrong, I have subscribed to renetto's videos on youtube. As great a youtuber as he is he just isn't notable. ScorpO 02:38, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
- Oakshade, can you post the relevant articles here? --badlydrawnjeff talk 02:42, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
- The stub content was supported by these two references:
Tedeschi, Bob (February 26, 2007). "E-Commerce Report; New Hot Properties: YouTube Celebrities". The New York Times.
Carney, Brian M. (September 8, 2006). "Fact or Fiction?". The Wall Street Journal.
The following was added under "Further reading"
Williams, Felicia (November 9, 2006). "Renetto Expresses His Thoughts on Commercialization". The Daily Reel. --Oakshade 02:51, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks. Overturn, notability established. --badlydrawnjeff talk 02:53, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
- Endorse G4 (via AfD)and A7 keep deleted Betacommand 03:09, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
- PS there were 2 valid AfD's both for delete the community has spoken Betacommand 03:12, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
- Relist This could have been a speedy per CSD G4, but it has been a while since the last creation, so undelete and relist on AFD (for the 3rd time).—— Eagle101 03:11, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
Trapped in the Drive-Thru
- Trapped in the Drive-Thru (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (restore|AfD)
The article on this song was speedy-deleted by an admin with the comment "article that makes no claim to significance of its (not yet existent) subject)". This song was listed by Rolling Stone magazine in the 100 best songs of 2006; additionally the subject of this article does exist, so the deleting admin was in error as to that. Ryanjunk 01:34, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
- Overturn, yet another invalid speedy. Songs aren't speedyable via A7. --badlydrawnjeff talk 01:36, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
- comment, so wait, if a band is speedied by A7, and they have say 10 song articles, do they have to go through AFD? —— Eagle101 03:04, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
Crunkfests
The reason that this particular page should not be deleted is fairly simple. A proper definition was used, but the citation was forgotten. Also by having this undeleted you are letting the people involved remeber the memories that were made. It may seem like a childish thing but this where I and many others have made life long friends. Most of the people involved had this special sort of bond that can never be recreated. It was something that does seem adolecent but is far from it. The deeper bonds that were established is the true purpose of having a proper online documentation of it. I hope that you reconsider. If the page is not to be undeleted some reasons and possible suggestions would be greatly appreciated.
(Greenough 00:30, 16 March 2007 (UTC))
Which articles? I'm not seeing anything in the logs. --Coredesat 01:14, 16 March 2007 (UTC)- Endorse deletion now that I've seen the deleted article. Looks to be a gathering of a few high school friends, which would make this a valid A7 (group). The article itself is almost a journal of the things that happened in these gatherings, such as things that "seemed like season 1 of the OC" and someone losing his pants. --Coredesat 01:43, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
- In that case, endorse a valid A7. --badlydrawnjeff talk 01:52, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
- Endorse deletion now that I've seen the deleted article. Looks to be a gathering of a few high school friends, which would make this a valid A7 (group). The article itself is almost a journal of the things that happened in these gatherings, such as things that "seemed like season 1 of the OC" and someone losing his pants. --Coredesat 01:43, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
- What are they? --badlydrawnjeff talk 01:37, 16 March 2007 (UTC)