Talk:Operation Overlord - Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by EnigmaMcmxc (talk | contribs) at 19:28, 20 May 2023 (→Change of codewords: re). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 19:28, 20 May 2023 by EnigmaMcmxc (talk | contribs) (→Change of codewords: re)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Skip to table of contents

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Operation Overlord article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Misplaced Pages? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1, 2Auto-archiving period: 3 months

Operation Overlord has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
July 2, 2008	Good article nominee	Not listed
May 2, 2014	Good article nominee	Listed
April 23, 2015	WikiProject A-class review	Not approved
A fact from this article appeared on Misplaced Pages's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on June 6, 2014.The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that Operation Overlord (detail pictured), the Allied invasion of Normandy in World War II, was the largest seaborne invasion in history?
Current status: Good article

This article has not yet been rated on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Military history: Maritime / South Pacific / British / Canadian / Dutch / European / French / German / North America / Polish / United States / World War II

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history

Associated task forces:
/
	Maritime warfare task force
	Australia, New Zealand and South Pacific military history task force
	British military history task force
	Canadian military history task force
	Dutch military history task force
	European military history task force
	French military history task force
	German military history task force
	North American military history task force
	Polish military history task force
	United States military history task force
	World War II task force

Additional information:
/
	This article has failed an A-Class review.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Normandy Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Normandy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Normandy on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NormandyWikipedia:WikiProject NormandyTemplate:WikiProject NormandyNormandy
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Poland Low‑importance

	Poland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Poland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Poland on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PolandWikipedia:WikiProject PolandTemplate:WikiProject PolandPoland
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Pritzker Military Library High‑importance

	This article is related to the Pritzker Military Museum & Library WikiProject. Please copy assessments of the article from the most major WikiProject template to this one as needed.Pritzker Military LibraryWikipedia:GLAM/PritzkerTemplate:WikiProject Pritzker-GLAMPritzker Military Library-related
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the importance scale.

This article is substantially duplicated by a piece in an external publication. Since the external publication copied Misplaced Pages rather than the reverse, please do not flag this article as a copyright violation of the following source:

Surhone, L. M. (2010), Saar Offensive: Saarland, Phoney War, The Blitz, Operation Overlord, Betascript Publishing

Additional comments
OCLC 699858364, ISBN 9786130438685.

Eisenhower message

Surely there must be a recording of Eisenhower's D-Day message that doesn't have the absurd "movie" music plastered all over it. It is certainly unauthentic and unecyclopedic 2600:1700:CA10:18A0:40A1:CBC8:75B2:255 (talk) 03:43, 31 August 2022 (UTC)

It's not the only video with such absurd music. Why were these videos accepted with such soundtrack? 74.59.74.76 (talk) 14:27, 27 February 2023 (UTC)

here's a version of it without the background music: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fQ7IKM-jiJI 74.59.74.76 (talk) 14:29, 27 February 2023 (UTC)

Polish losses too low?

Article gives Polish losses as 1,350 casualties, August 1-23 1944, yet the articles on Misplaced Pages about Operation Totalize (August 8-9) and Operation Tractable (August 14-21), the two biggest Normandy battles with polish involvement, show Polish losses during those two combined as being 2,097. Not to mention the casualties suffered on other days. 72.26.17.219 (talk) 16:15, 6 February 2023 (UTC)

Preview text vandalism?

When I hover the link to this article from another page, the preview text comes up "Operation Spongebob was the codename for the Eugene..."

Why this shows up in the preview but not the article or how to fix it I have no idea, so I thought I'd flag it here for someone who does. Orthostasis (talk) 09:48, 26 March 2023 (UTC)

The problem was fixed on Match 24. As some pages are cached, it might take a while for the vandalism to disappear completely. — Diannaa (talk) 11:56, 26 March 2023 (UTC)

Vandalism, of a sort.

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

When I hover over the link "Battle of Normandy" in Tiger II, it says "Operation Spongebob was the codename for Eugene, the Allied operation that launched..." and yet when I click on it it says "Operation Overlord" and "Battle of Normandy". Someone tell me how to fix it or fix it for me? KingAviationKid (talk) 15:56, 27 March 2023 (UTC)

Just give it a few minutes, there was some vandalism that's already been reverted and the cache needs to catch up. Sario528 (talk) 16:17, 27 March 2023 (UTC)

Change of codewords

On an Antiques Roadshow episode (apparently "Durham Cathedral I" in 2016) a guest brought in some documents inherited from a relative purporting to show that the codewords had been changed shortly before the invasion went forward, with distinct new codewords for "Operation Overlord" ("Exercise Hornpipe") and "D Day" ("Halcyon"), as well as a codeword to announce postponement. The documents also included copies of signals reports using these codewords. It's been quite a few years since that episode aired: were these documents ever authenticated? 207.180.169.36 (talk) 02:06, 20 May 2023 (UTC)

I found a few articles that repeat the information from the show, for example this one by The Times (paywall). The same info and photos can be seen in a Daily Mail article on the subject.

Brown (1975), Bodyguard of Lies v. 10, p. 624: "Eisenhower directed that the signal 'Exercise Hornpipe plus six' be sent to all Commanders-in-Chief. It mean that D-Day was set for June 5, 1944."
Haswell (1979), The Intelligence and Deception of the D-Day Landings, p. 151: "The Allied planning staff had come to the same conclusion as Rommel. On three days only, 5, 6, and 7 June, would factors such as tides and currents, phase of the moon and hours of daylight be right for Neptune. Y-Day, codenamed Halcyon, the day on which all preparations for the assault must be completed, was set for 1 June".

Haswell (1979), The Intelligence and Deception of the D-Day Landings, p. 191: "Ripcord: codeword used in postponing D-Day"

Kind of seems like the documents were taken out of context and the show/press ran with it without hitting the books?EnigmaMcmxc (talk) 19:28, 20 May 2023 (UTC)

Categories: