Misplaced Pages

Talk:Nagorno-Karabakh

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by PrimeBOT (talk | contribs) at 11:44, 23 May 2023 (top: Task 24: banner removal following a TFD). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 11:44, 23 May 2023 by PrimeBOT (talk | contribs) (top: Task 24: banner removal following a TFD)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Skip to table of contents
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Nagorno-Karabakh article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
Article policies
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21Auto-archiving period: 30 days 

Template:Vital article

The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information.
Peace dove with olive branch in its beakPlease stay calm and civil while commenting or presenting evidence, and do not make personal attacks. Be patient when approaching solutions to any issues. If consensus is not reached, other solutions exist to draw attention and ensure that more editors mediate or comment on the dispute.
Nagorno-Karabakh received a peer review by Misplaced Pages editors, which is now archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article.
This article has not yet been rated on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
WikiProject iconArmenia High‑importance
WikiProject iconNagorno-Karabakh is within the scope of WikiProject Armenia, an attempt to improve and better organize information in articles related or pertaining to Armenia and Armenians. If you would like to contribute or collaborate, you could edit the article attached to this page or visit the project page for further information.ArmeniaWikipedia:WikiProject ArmeniaTemplate:WikiProject ArmeniaArmenian
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
WikiProject iconArtsakh Top‑importance
WikiProject iconNagorno-Karabakh is within the scope of WikiProject Artsakh, an attempt to improve and better organize information in articles related or pertaining to Artsakh and Artsakhians. If you would like to contribute or collaborate, you could edit the article attached to this page or visit the project page for further information.ArtsakhWikipedia:WikiProject ArtsakhTemplate:WikiProject ArtsakhArtsakh
TopThis article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
WikiProject iconAzerbaijan Top‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Azerbaijan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Azerbaijan-related topics on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AzerbaijanWikipedia:WikiProject AzerbaijanTemplate:WikiProject AzerbaijanAzerbaijanWikiProject icon
TopThis article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconCaucasia (inactive)
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Caucasia, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.CaucasiaWikipedia:WikiProject CaucasiaTemplate:WikiProject CaucasiaCaucasia
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
WikiProject iconLimited recognition Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Limited recognition, a WikiProject dedicated to improving the coverage of entities with limited recognition on Misplaced Pages by contributing to articles relating to unrecognized states and separatist movements.
To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join our WikiProject by signing your name at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.Limited recognitionWikipedia:WikiProject Limited recognitionTemplate:WikiProject Limited recognitionLimited recognition
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
WikiProject iconGeography High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Geography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of geography on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GeographyWikipedia:WikiProject GeographyTemplate:WikiProject Geographygeography
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject Geography To-do list:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:
ConsensusWARNING: ACTIVE ARBITRATION REMEDIES

The article Nagorno-Karabakh is currently subject to active arbitration remedies, as laid out during a 2007 Arbitration case. Per a 2012 complaint at WP:AE about apparent sock editing, Nagorno-Karabakh is under a single reversion restriction. This is a modified 1RR restriction to limit the power of newly-created accounts to prevail in disputes, while still leaving the article open to editing:

  1. All editors are under a 1RR per day restriction.
  2. Editors with less than 500 article edits, less than three months old or are anonymous editors are under a 1RR per day restriction with no exceptions.
  3. Editors not subject to the #2 above can revert edits by those who are subject to #2 without breaking 1RR, but are still subject to the general edit warring policy.
  4. Violations of the special 1RR by any editor can be reported at WP:Arbitration enforcement or to any admin.

John Senacherib

Isn't this Senekerim-Hovhannes Artsruni, who has his own page? If so, please do repair the link. 2001:1C04:4706:EC00:E0BA:D74D:F7D8:D563 (talk) 22:39, 24 January 2023 (UTC)


the lede should mention ethnicity

The lede says nothing about "ethnic Armenians live here along with some ethnic Azeris", the reader is left wondering "why is Armenia involved with the Artsakhians?" 2603:8001:D300:A631:0:0:0:1D29 (talk) 05:35, 9 September 2022 (UTC)

Yeah, you're right; it says that Armenia and Azerbaijan have been negotiating over it but doesn't explain why Armenia cares. Could definitely be improved. --Golbez (talk) 16:55, 9 September 2022 (UTC)

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 19 September 2022

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Hereby I want to ask a permission to do a small edit, which I like to add one citation for the history section, specifically regarding the decision to exclude as many as Azerbaijani settlement from NKAO to ensure its Armenian majority.

If the permission is given, I will change this to Potier, Tim (2001). Conflict in Nagorno-Karabakh, Abkhazia and South Ossetia, A Legal Appraisal. The Hague, Netherlands: Kluwer Law International. p. 5. ISBN 9041114777.

Mfikriansori (talk) 18:49, 19 September 2022 (UTC) Mfikriansori (talk) 18:49, 19 September 2022 (UTC)

 Done I am assuming good faith that the source says what Mfikriansori says it does.MJLTalk 18:54, 19 September 2022 (UTC)

Looks upright biased towards Armenia

First, the name "Artsakh" is rediculous. Made up names to justify Armenian occupation. Second, Armenia is governing and supplying lifelines to these Azerbaijani territory. So literally Armenians are breaking the UN conditions here. They don't care about Azerbaijani sovereignty. Three, the government of Artsakh runs from Armenia. Says it all.

To conclude, Azerbaijan should take the autonomy of that region and save Azerbaijan from invasions. 2400:2651:2381:7200:F007:71D4:4450:A262 (talk) 05:22, 15 January 2023 (UTC)

Please see WP:NOTFORUM, this is not a forum for general discussion about the topic. If you have any specific suggestions about the content of the article, you can make it here. Revolution Saga (talk) 09:33, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
Categories: