This is an old revision of this page, as edited by PrimeBOT (talk | contribs) at 11:44, 23 May 2023 (→top: Task 24: banner removal following a TFD). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 11:44, 23 May 2023 by PrimeBOT (talk | contribs) (→top: Task 24: banner removal following a TFD)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Skip to table of contents |
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Nagorno-Karabakh article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21Auto-archiving period: 30 days |
The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information. |
Please stay calm and civil while commenting or presenting evidence, and do not make personal attacks. Be patient when approaching solutions to any issues. If consensus is not reached, other solutions exist to draw attention and ensure that more editors mediate or comment on the dispute. |
Nagorno-Karabakh received a peer review by Misplaced Pages editors, which is now archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article. |
This article has not yet been rated on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
{{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
{{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
{{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
{{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details. |
WARNING: ACTIVE ARBITRATION REMEDIES The article Nagorno-Karabakh is currently subject to active arbitration remedies, as laid out during a 2007 Arbitration case. Per a 2012 complaint at WP:AE about apparent sock editing, Nagorno-Karabakh is under a single reversion restriction. This is a modified 1RR restriction to limit the power of newly-created accounts to prevail in disputes, while still leaving the article open to editing:
|
John Senacherib
Isn't this Senekerim-Hovhannes Artsruni, who has his own page? If so, please do repair the link. 2001:1C04:4706:EC00:E0BA:D74D:F7D8:D563 (talk) 22:39, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
the lede should mention ethnicity
The lede says nothing about "ethnic Armenians live here along with some ethnic Azeris", the reader is left wondering "why is Armenia involved with the Artsakhians?" 2603:8001:D300:A631:0:0:0:1D29 (talk) 05:35, 9 September 2022 (UTC)
- Yeah, you're right; it says that Armenia and Azerbaijan have been negotiating over it but doesn't explain why Armenia cares. Could definitely be improved. --Golbez (talk) 16:55, 9 September 2022 (UTC)
Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 19 September 2022
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Hereby I want to ask a permission to do a small edit, which I like to add one citation for the history section, specifically regarding the decision to exclude as many as Azerbaijani settlement from NKAO to ensure its Armenian majority.
If the permission is given, I will change this to Potier, Tim (2001). Conflict in Nagorno-Karabakh, Abkhazia and South Ossetia, A Legal Appraisal. The Hague, Netherlands: Kluwer Law International. p. 5. ISBN 9041114777.
Mfikriansori (talk) 18:49, 19 September 2022 (UTC) Mfikriansori (talk) 18:49, 19 September 2022 (UTC)
- Done I am assuming good faith that the source says what Mfikriansori says it does. –MJL ‐Talk‐ 18:54, 19 September 2022 (UTC)
Looks upright biased towards Armenia
First, the name "Artsakh" is rediculous. Made up names to justify Armenian occupation. Second, Armenia is governing and supplying lifelines to these Azerbaijani territory. So literally Armenians are breaking the UN conditions here. They don't care about Azerbaijani sovereignty. Three, the government of Artsakh runs from Armenia. Says it all.
To conclude, Azerbaijan should take the autonomy of that region and save Azerbaijan from invasions. 2400:2651:2381:7200:F007:71D4:4450:A262 (talk) 05:22, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
- Please see WP:NOTFORUM, this is not a forum for general discussion about the topic. If you have any specific suggestions about the content of the article, you can make it here. Revolution Saga (talk) 09:33, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
- Misplaced Pages controversial topics
- Old requests for peer review
- All unassessed articles
- B-Class Armenian articles
- High-importance Armenian articles
- WikiProject Armenia articles
- B-Class Artsakh articles
- Top-importance Artsakh articles
- WikiProject Artsakh articles
- B-Class Azerbaijan articles
- Top-importance Azerbaijan articles
- WikiProject Azerbaijan articles
- WikiProject templates with unknown parameters
- B-Class Limited recognition articles
- Mid-importance Limited recognition articles
- WikiProject Limited recognition articles
- B-Class geography articles
- High-importance geography articles
- WikiProject Geography articles