This is an old revision of this page, as edited by PrimeBOT (talk | contribs) at 11:45, 23 May 2023 (→top: Task 24: banner removal following a TFD). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 11:45, 23 May 2023 by PrimeBOT (talk | contribs) (→top: Task 24: banner removal following a TFD)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)This is the talk page for discussing WikiProject Poetry and anything related to its purposes and tasks. |
|
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8Auto-archiving period: 3 months |
Poetry NA‑class | |||||||
|
Wong Phui Nam
Hello, I have recently expanded the article Wong Phui Nam, which while not tagged I believe would fit within this Wikiproject. I would be grateful for any edits or input from those more familiar about writing about poets in an encyclopaedic style. Best, CMD (talk) 16:06, 4 October 2022 (UTC)
Whack!
Whack! You've been collectively whacked with a hover of wet trouts. For the state of the page Poet, as noted at Misplaced Pages:Articles for improvement/Nominations – Emir of Misplaced Pages (talk) 13:34, 9 October 2022 (UTC) |
- This project has been mostly inactive for about a decade now. Good luck with your fish. --Midnightdreary (talk) 16:48, 9 October 2022 (UTC)
Featured Article Save Award for H.D.
There is a Featured Article Save Award nomination at Misplaced Pages talk:Featured article review/H.D./archive2. Please join the discussion to recognize and celebrate editors who helped assure this article would retain its featured status. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 01:34, 24 October 2022 (UTC)
RfC over whether or not James Joyce should have an infobox
Talk:James Joyce § Should the article have an infobox I dream of horses (Contribs) (Talk) 20:41, 3 December 2022 (UTC)
Ballade en vieil langage françoys
This article appears to be part of this project, but the talk page does include the project banner. Also, the article has no categories. 76.14.122.5 (talk) 06:12, 3 January 2023 (UTC)
- Hi 76.14, you should feel free to tag the article for both! I've done so here. czar 06:38, 3 January 2023 (UTC)
Project-independent quality assessments
Quality assessments by Misplaced Pages editors rate articles in terms of completeness, organization, prose quality, sourcing, etc. Most wikiprojects follow the general guidelines at Misplaced Pages:Content assessment, but some have specialized assessment guidelines. A recent Village pump proposal was approved and has been implemented to add a |class=
parameter to {{WikiProject banner shell}}, which can display a general quality assessment for an article, and to let project banner templates "inherit" this assessment.
No action is required if your wikiproject follows the standard assessment approach. Over time, quality assessments will be migrated up to {{WikiProject banner shell}}, and your project banner will automatically "inherit" any changes to the general assessments for the purpose of assigning categories.
However, if your project has decided to "opt out" and follow a non-standard quality assessment approach, all you have to do is modify your wikiproject banner template to pass {{WPBannerMeta}} a new |QUALITY_CRITERIA=custom
parameter. If this is done, changes to the general quality assessment will be ignored, and your project-level assessment will be displayed and used to create categories, as at present. Aymatth2 (talk) 20:47, 12 April 2023 (UTC)