Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license.
Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat.
We can research this topic together.
This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Misplaced Pages's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw
This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York (state), a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of New York on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York (state)Misplaced Pages:WikiProject New York (state)Template:WikiProject New York (state)New York (state)
This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York City, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New York City-related articles on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York CityWikipedia:WikiProject New York CityTemplate:WikiProject New York CityNew York City
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States courts and judges, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United States federal courts, courthouses, and United States federal judges on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United States courts and judgesWikipedia:WikiProject United States courts and judgesTemplate:WikiProject United States courts and judgesUnited States courts and judges
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Jewish Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Jewish Women on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Jewish WomenWikipedia:WikiProject Jewish WomenTemplate:WikiProject Jewish WomenJewish Women
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers
This article has been viewed enough times in a single year to make it into the Top 50 Report annual list. This happened in 2020, when it received 11,884,007 views.
This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in the Top 25 Report4 times. The weeks in which this happened:
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.
A few lines down in the "In Popular Culture" section: "contented" should be changed to "contents" – the noun has been incorrectly transformed into the alternate-meaning verb formulation of the root word. Learnedgopher (talk) 02:03, 24 March 2023 (UTC)
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.
I think there are enough critiques of Ginsburg's City of Sherrill v. Oneida Indian Nation of New York decision by Indigenous people and scholars to merit mentioning that it provoked those responses. Many reports of the Vatican's recent decision to repudiate the discovery doctrine cite that decision as the most recent use of the concept, so it's clearly part of her legacy. Pr4xer0 (talk) 19:31, 30 March 2023 (UTC)
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.
In the first paragraph, it says: "She eventually became part of the liberal wing of the Court as the Court shifted to the right over time." This is unsourced and highly controversial. 174.255.1.103 (talk) 20:55, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
I agree with the request, and it's easiest to simply delete the sentence. It adds little other than opinion, and is unsourced. I moved the wiki link to the next location mentioning her liberal views. Efbrazil (talk) 17:28, 10 April 2023 (UTC)
I additionally moved forward content that was sourced and covered her liberal leanings to replace what was deleted. I think it overall reads better now and removes redundancy from an over-long lead. Efbrazil (talk) 17:36, 10 April 2023 (UTC)
I disagree that this text was "unsourced and highly controversial"—it's widely discussed in sources and fully cited in the article body. Not at all controversial. Binksternet (talk) 17:39, 10 April 2023 (UTC)
Sorry for my mangled comment in edit history, entered accidentally. It's fair to say existing text wasn't wrong, but I do think the redundancy in the text should be removed, and the third paragraph shortened. See if what's there now works for you. Efbrazil (talk) 17:48, 10 April 2023 (UTC)
You have mixed up the 1990s "moderate" view with the eventual liberal view of her. Her position changed over time, but you erased that fact. You told the reader she was immediately seen as liberal, which is not true. Binksternet (talk) 18:19, 10 April 2023 (UTC)
LA Times source further in the article is clear she was seen as center left. For instance:
People for the American Way, a liberal group, called her “a significant improvement” over other recent nominees, but cited questions about her stands on “access to the courts, privacy rights, and her capacity to forge effective coalitions among justices on the moderate-liberal wings of the court.”
And:
Clinton was said to have sought a moderate who would move slightly to the left a court that often splits, 5 to 4, on contentious issues.
On reviewing some more sources I removed the "left-leaning" part in front of moderate as I couldn't find a source from the time that made that explicit. Mostly it appears she was a consensus choice, satisfying to both liberals and conservatives given that she was being chosed by a democratic president. Efbrazil (talk) 19:53, 10 April 2023 (UTC)
Death and Succession
The very end of the last paragraph under the 'Death and Succession' tab reads:
"Days before her death, Ginsburg dictated a statement to her granddaughter Clara Spera, as heard by Ginsburg's doctor and others in the room at the time: "My most fervent wish is that I will not be replaced until a new president is installed." Despite Ginsburg's request, President Trump's pick to replace her, Amy Coney Barrett, was confirmed by the Senate on October 27."
Is this information relevant? If it is, is it fair to say that the Senate confirmed her successor 'despite her request,' or rather, that her request had no bearing on the proceedings at all? 174.213.161.82 (talk) 04:28, 23 April 2023 (UTC)
Fair enough, I removed "Despite her request" from the sentence as it offered little of substance and could give the appearance of bias. Certainly her request has little bearing on what followed her death, and the nomination was pushed through "despite" many points of opposition. Efbrazil (talk) 17:24, 23 April 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 8 June 2023
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.
In the recognition section, the item appears as:
Also in 2023, Ginsburg will be featured on a USPS Forever stamp. The stamp was designed by art director Ethel Kessler, using an oil painting by Michael J. Deas based on a photograph by Philip Bermingham.
Please add: This stamp will be issued on 02 OCT 2023, with the First-Day-of-Issue city being Washington D.C.
More News of any 'Issue Ceremony' will be announced by the USPS about 4-6 weeks before that date. ( Locations/Time/Presenters/Ways to waive admission fees/ect. ) Lefty1998 (talk) 16:33, 8 June 2023 (UTC)
.png){kind=small}
.jpg){kind=small}
Done 
Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. – Muboshgu (talk) 19:34, 30 March 2023 (UTC)
Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. - FlightTime (open channel) 20:56, 9 April 2023 (UTC)