Misplaced Pages

User talk:69.132.199.100

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Coredesat (talk | contribs) at 07:09, 19 March 2007 (decline unblock request). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 07:09, 19 March 2007 by Coredesat (talk | contribs) (decline unblock request)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Exceptions Since the rule is intended to prevent edit warring, reverts which are clearly not such will not breach the rule. Since edit warring is considered harmful, exceptions to the rule will be construed narrowly.

Since reverting in this context means undoing the actions of another editor or editors, reverting your own actions ("self-reverting") will not breach the rule.

Other exceptions to the rule include the following:


Reverting unsourced or poorly sourced controversial material about living persons (see Misplaced Pages:Biographies of living persons)


Next time be more careful 69.132.199.100 06:53, 19 March 2007 (UTC)

You violated the three revert rule. A fan site is not considered to be controversial, if the content of the site is not libellous. However, placing libellous statements on wikipedia is. Previous to the block, instead of performing page reverts, you should have discussed the fan site being deleted on the talk page. Real96 07:04, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

69.132.199.100 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

block by rogue admin, known sock puppet, was reverting vandilise he doing, he hop onto admin account. please

Decline reason:

Definitely a 3RR violation over the inclusion of an entry in the filmography section of Shelby Young: , , , . It's an open-and-shut case. — Coredesat 07:09, 19 March 2007 (UTC)


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.


User infoThis is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.