Misplaced Pages

User talk:BozMo

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Irishlaw (talk | contribs) at 18:15, 19 March 2007. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 18:15, 19 March 2007 by Irishlaw (talk | contribs)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

See User_talk:BozMo/archive

hello

Please put messages for me here! I am rather tidy so I will delete once received unless there is a reason not to (such as interest to others)--BozMo 10:30, 29 Apr 2004 (UTC)

Message:

Hi, thanks for the note about my recent edits. I was unsure about the ruling on spam, but sure that the links were good. I will now request inclusion as recommended. -- Iru-dcaf

Comments on 2006 Misplaced Pages CD Selection, the 2007 Misplaced Pages CD Selection the charity I work for SOS Children's Villages UK my personal site: Cates, my book: letter to Peter, my religion.

I will visit here most days but have a busy job and young kids so not always. My other email is my christian name @ my homepage.

Barnstar

For your 2006 Misplaced Pages CD Selection of Misplaced Pages. Sincerely, Maurreen 07:46, 6 April 2006 (UTC)

Spamstar of Glory

The Spamstar of Glory
Presented to BozMo for diligence in fighting spam on Misplaced Pages

--A. B. 16:30, 8 January 2007 (UTC)

This is overdue -- I meant to do this several weeks ago. Thanks for all your work and support. --A. B. 16:30, 8 January 2007 (UTC)

Welcome to The Conspiracy

Following up your note on WP:AN, you indeed stand among the "accused" as shown here. We gather at midnight to burn black candles around a NEC SX6. Raymond Arritt 15:46, 7 March 2007 (UTC)

Your msg

Thanks. You are welcome to improve the article. You are correct: it is emotionally difficult stuff. ←Humus sapiens 00:55, 8 March 2007 (UTC)

Assistance in Speedy Deletion of Kriya Yoga (disambiguation)

Sir, may I please request your help in the speedy deletion of Kriya Yoga (disambiguation)? It is unecessary because a disambiguation page for Kriya Yoga already exists as Kriya. Thanks so much. - Watchtower Sentinel 23:48, 14 March 2007 (UTC)

I suspect this user is one of many socks of the indef. blocked user Hamsacharya_duh (talk · contribs). See my username and you can put 2 and 2 together :) ... --Hamsacharya dan 02:50, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
Anyway speedy deletion doesn't quite work like this. If you tag an article and admin will review it. --BozMo talk 08:34, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
Yes sir, it was properly tagged before I solicited your assistance. As a result the redundant disambiguation has now been transformed into a redirect by another Admin. I am now moving for the deletion of its Talk Page please see talk:Kriya_Yoga_(disambiguation). Thank you! - Watchtower Sentinel 10:35, 15 March 2007 (UTC)

WikiProject Spam

BozMo, unless I hear otherwise, I'm thinking that it may be most conducive to report my spam findings to you on your Talk page. I appreciate that you're someone who will consider the facts, even if you suspect an ulterior motive. Signing off for now, this is The SpamWatcher 13:50, 16 March 2007 (UTC)

BozMo, I can't put my finger on it, but there's something very wrong about Roy Morgan Research. Maybe it's just the fact that the article contains such unsourced, advertising fluff gems like: "Roy Morgan Research is a truly international market research company and the provider of the world’s most extensive and only true single source survey." Even if that were important, what does it even mean to be "most extensive" and "single source", if you're a survey? Then there's: "Roy Morgan Single Source is thorough, accurate, and provides comprehensive, directly applicable information...". And: "Roy Morgan Research is able to employ the most appropriate methodology to meet the requirements of each study". This is an advertisement, not even attempting to disguise itself as an encyclopedia article. At least, that's the conclusion of The SpamWatcher 04:00, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
I think that Segment Y has a very suspicious edit history. User Asish.m.j creates the article in late July, then forgets to sign in again in early August (single-purpose account). No claim of notability or outside sources. That smells fishy to The SpamWatcher 04:07, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
Do you think that John Mckeever should be making these edits to the article about his own company? The information is helpful, but how much is Misplaced Pages NOT supposed to be a phone directory? Who's always finding the spam others overlook? It's The SpamWatcher 04:19, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
You've got to bust Dittberner Associates. Why? Look carefully at the edits of this anon IP, especially those about Dittberner and IPTV. Spammity spam spam, unearthed by The SpamWatcher 04:24, 18 March 2007 (UTC)

Misplaced Pages CD Selection

Hi BozMo, Thanks for your note on my talk page. I had a quick look (will check it in more details later). I was wondering why all footnotes are removed in these articles?

Anyways, I, and many other wikipedians, have worked a lot on Islam article to raise it to FA status. I think the new version is significantly better than its previous version.

I also rewrote the article on Isaac. It is now a GA article. I think it might be worth adding.

I'll check with other articles later. Cheers, --Aminz 19:41, 17 March 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for your reply. I agree with you. --Aminz 21:05, 17 March 2007 (UTC)

I've looked through it a bit. There don't seem to be any controversial articles on Islam on there, fortunately. A neat (uncontroversial) one to add would be Mukataba. It's a thorough article on an obscure topic. Also, a good person to ask about this (better than me) would be User:Beit Or. Arrow740 07:45, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
Not so "uncontroversial". --Aminz 07:48, 19 March 2007 (UTC)


Hi BozMo, I am taking steps to improve this page Global Market Insite. I was just made aware this page was marked for deletion today the 19th. I have not received any notification on my bio page or through e-mail. I did want some clarification on why it is marked for deletion.

What exactly does "no visible notability" mean? I did read the Misplaced Pages definitions but they are somewhat vague. Could you please review the sections that were added and let me know if this increases or meets the notable visibility issue? Many studies conducted with the research panels have significant results which governments, universities and news agencies rely upon worldwide. Thanks for any input.

Irishlaw 18:15, 19 March 2007 (UTC)