Talk:Oath Keepers - Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Lowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs) at 05:39, 16 July 2023 (Archiving 2 discussion(s) to Talk:Oath Keepers/Archive 3) (bot). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 05:39, 16 July 2023 by Lowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs) (Archiving 2 discussion(s) to Talk:Oath Keepers/Archive 3) (bot)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Oath Keepers article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Misplaced Pages? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1, 2, 3Auto-archiving period: 3 months

This article has not yet been rated on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

United States Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.

United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Nevada (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Nevada, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.NevadaWikipedia:WikiProject NevadaTemplate:WikiProject NevadaNevada

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Organizations Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

This article was nominated for deletion on 11 August 2015. The result of the discussion was keep.

The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people, which has been designated as a contentious topic.

Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Misplaced Pages, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.

A previous religious affiliated organization?

I seem to remember a previous organization named (iirc) "Oath Keepers" (I don't think it is related to this organization).

IIRC, I ran into the organization at various church functions, and, iiuc, their focus was on father's fulfilling their fatherhood (my choice of words).

Does anybody remember that organization? Did I get the name wrong? Does it still exist? Is it related or somehow a predecessor of this organization?

Thanks for any information! I'm sorry if this entry doesn't meet the criteria for appearing on a talk page -- hmm, but if there is another organization with the same name, I think it should be mentioned (and "disambiguated" somewhere (if not related to this organization)).

Rhkramer (talk) 14:48, 26 May 2023 (UTC)

Promise Keepers. At the top of this article there is a "not to be confused with" cross-link. They are unrelated except for the similar name. VQuakr (talk) 17:18, 26 May 2023 (UTC)

Thanks! I was (indeed) confused. Rhkramer (talk) 19:46, 26 May 2023 (UTC)

Include sources in the template

"Ideology" and "Allegiance" need source and notes. 93.45.229.98 (talk) 12:54, 4 June 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 8 July 2023

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Adding sources for the ideology parameter. 93.45.229.98 (talk) 15:36, 8 July 2023 (UTC)

Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. voorts (talk/contributions) 17:39, 8 July 2023 (UTC)

@Voorts

These ideologies in the infobox need sources:

American nationalism

Conservatism

Right-libertarianism

White supremacy (alleged, denied by the organization)

Trumpism 93.45.229.98 (talk) 06:21, 10 July 2023 (UTC)

@93.45.229.98 Edit requests are not for asking other people to do work for you. voorts (talk/contributions) 11:51, 10 July 2023 (UTC)

@Voorts I can't edit the article there is a block, so I made an edit request. 93.45.229.98 (talk) 13:01, 10 July 2023 (UTC)

@93.45.229.98 Yes, but it's your obligation to provide sources, not the person answering your edit request. Please review WP:ER and WP:ERSAMPLE, provide reliable sources, and then reopen your edit request per the ER instructions. voorts (talk/contributions) 13:39, 10 July 2023 (UTC)

@Voorts No, maybe I wasn't clear. In the infobox, the ideology parameter has no source to support the ideologies (see WP:OR). If there are no sources please remove it (this is the edit request). 93.45.229.98 (talk) 13:59, 10 July 2023 (UTC)

Reliable sources have described the organization's politics as all of those things, as reflected in the article. There doesn't need to be a citation for every point in the infobox. voorts (talk/contributions) 21:26, 10 July 2023 (UTC)

@Voorts In the article the terms "right-libertarianism," "white supremacy," etc. appear only in the infobox (and in the infobox there are no sources). 93.45.229.98 (talk) 11:55, 11 July 2023 (UTC)

A quick google search uncovers several reliable sources that describes the Oath Keepers using those (and other) terms. FIXTHEPROBLEM instead of pushing to delete things where sources exist. voorts (talk/contributions) 12:31, 11 July 2023 (UTC)

@Voorts Firstly, the sources must be cited in the article (not simply exist outside Misplaced Pages), secondly I can only make editing requests (because the article is protected), and third none of the sources you quoted describe Oath Keepers as "white supremacist."

In the first source "white supremacist group" refers to the Proud Boys; in the second source idem - article speaks of distinct groups KKK or neo-Nazi skinheads (white supremacists) and Three Percenters and Oath Keepers (far-right militias); CSIS article mentions islamophobia and nativism which is different from white supremacism.

The only source I found - similar to white supremacism - is in The Conversation in an article by a scholar who accuses both Donald Trump and Oath Keepers of being "white nationalists," ergo WP:FRINGE.

As I said it would be a case of putting sources for the rest of the ideologies as well. 93.45.229.98 (talk) 15:18, 11 July 2023 (UTC)

Categories: