This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Bobrayner (talk | contribs) at 20:27, 23 July 2023 (→RFC: Ancestry: clarify). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 20:27, 23 July 2023 by Bobrayner (talk | contribs) (→RFC: Ancestry: clarify)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)The contents of the Sophie of France (1786–1787) page were merged into Marie Antoinette on 20 November 2022. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
Sophie of France (1786–1787) was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 19 September 2022 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into Marie Antoinette. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here. |
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Marie Antoinette article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6Auto-archiving period: 28 days |
Marie Antoinette is a former featured article candidate. Please view the links under Article milestones below to see why the nomination was archived. For older candidates, please check the archive. | |||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
Facts from this article were featured on Misplaced Pages's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on October 16, 2005, October 16, 2011, October 16, 2013, October 16, 2016, October 16, 2018, and October 16, 2021. | |||||||||||||
Current status: Former featured article candidate |
This article has not yet been rated on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
{{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
{{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
{{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
{{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
{{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
Archives | ||||||
|
||||||
This page has archives. Sections older than 28 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 3 sections are present. |
Infobox photo issue
Hi! Dialuanny0 here! Back in January/February 2022, I saw a Misplaced Pages user make a topic on this article’s talk page about the infobox photo. They were talking about reverting it the original one/changing it to something else, which I can agree with. They made a good argument about it. It has been awhile since then, and I’m ready to talk about changes with the infobox photo! Here are some photos that I think we could possibly change the infobox image to:
File:Marie-Antoinette_par_Elisabeth_Vig%C3%A9e-Lebrun_-_1783.jpg#mw-jump-to-license
File:Marie_Antoinette_Adult.jpg#mw-jump-to-license
File:Gautier-Dagoty_-_Marie-Antoinette,_1775.jpg#mw-jump-to-license Dialuanny0 (talk) 03:42, 4 May 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 18 June 2023
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
"As a result of all these fashion activities, Marie Antoinette presided over one of the most important and fashionable courts in history and she was dominant over all of the other ladies of the court; as for her bearing and appearance the queen was very majestic and charismatic in spite of the fact that she gained a lot of weight over the years due to her many pregnancies. In spite of her very ample proportions, Marie Antoinette represented and played the role of the queen better than anyone in her court with her grace and demeanor."
Change to: As a result of all these fashion activities, Marie Antoinette presided over one of the most important and fashionable courts in history and she was dominant over all of the other ladies of the court. As for her bearing and appearance the queen was very majestic and charismatic. She gained a lot of weight over the years due to her many pregnancies. Marie Antoinette represented and played the role of the queen better than anyone in her court with her grace and demeanor. 89.19.79.27 (talk) 10:41, 18 June 2023 (UTC)
So you basically propose to delete "In spite of her very ample proportions ...". I agree, this is insensitive and fat-shaming. PatGallacher (talk) 14:03, 18 June 2023 (UTC)
- Honestly, I feel like that whole section above could be deleted. While I'm certainly not an expert on Marie Antoinette, I can't see how talking about her 'bearing' is relevant in the slightest - if this is somehow relevant and I'm simply missing context please do correct me though. This section was added all at once with no other content, and the editor who inserted it also made this edit - SeriousHist, would you mind explaining why this content is important? Tollens (talk) 04:14, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
- I have decided to be bold and delete the offending phrase. More serious changes may merit discussion. PatGallacher (talk) 06:45, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
Hello I simply added the impact of Marie Antoinette on her court and the fashion of her days ; Marie Antoinette life was affected deeply first by her fashion impact ; she was a model in fashion who was followed in all Europe . In addition this was a very important political issue with time , the people of France began to turn on their queen because of her lifestyle and this affected her popularity leading to the French Revolution. If you read any book on Marie Antoinette this was a very important issue for her before the birth of her children. Frankly a controversy over an issue who defined 20 years of the queen life : she was called the queen of fashion in spite that she gained a lot of ample proportions ; I’am simply describing the historical fact and not fat-shaming her but glorifying her as the queen of fashion in history despite her fat (fat is beautiful if you want ) ; but that is not the crux of the matter, it is one line in a whole paragraph. We can’t judge people who live 200 years ago according to our modern standards; their ideas were different than us . This is not an ideological article but an historical one SeriousHist (talk) 16:01, 20 June 2023 (UTC) To have consensus I agree to the change already made and I hope we can all work together. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SeriousHist (talk • contribs) 16:13, 20 June 2023 (UTC) European History is my speciality ; this article is good but It need some sources who are missing. To see how I work I saw in the article of another important queen Elizabeth Tudor that the establishment of the first colony in North America is not mentioned and the fondation of the Eastern Company for India ; I added both ; here I saw the same problem; a major fact of Marie Antoinette life and impact was missing. Thank you all. SeriousHist (talk) 16:24, 20 June 2023 (UTC) https://www.thecollector.com/marie-antoinette-controversial-fashion-queen/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by SeriousHist (talk • contribs) 17:23, 20 June 2023 (UTC) https://www.itsbeyondmycontrol.com/18th-century-fashion-marie-antoinette-the-queen-of-haute-couture/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by SeriousHist (talk • contribs) 17:26, 20 June 2023 (UTC) https://www.nationalgeographic.com/history/history-magazine/article/daily-life-france-fashion-marie-antoinette — Preceding unsigned comment added by SeriousHist (talk • contribs) 17:28, 20 June 2023 (UTC) SeriousHist (talk) 17:38, 20 June 2023 (UTC)
https://www.savoirflair.com/fashion/100411/marie-antoinette-inspired-runway-collections SeriousHist (talk) 17:38, 20 June 2023 (UTC) In conclusion I added important new sources here to show the impact of that subject in Marie Antoinette life . This was a very important feature who defined her life for more than a decade with a massive social , political and cultural impact felt all over the world for a long period of time. I think it is worth a new paragraph who should be added to the article. Also it is very important to diversify the sources in that article who depend heavily on Fraser ( A great historian but who should not be the only or even major source of her life ). Thank you all. SeriousHist (talk) 17:43, 20 June 2023 (UTC)
Not done: removing from edit request backlog until there's a clearer consensus about what changes to make. (My unsolicited opinion is that if any of the material is to remain, it be rewritten to be more encyclopedic and with inline attribution to Fraser as he is apparently the sole source of it.) Xan747 (talk) 19:45, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
RFC: Ancestry
|
I proposed the inclusion of {{ahnentafel}}
in "ancestry" section (with reliable source and non-trivial, but only can extend to great-grandparents) for this article, which had been removed last 25 October 2019, and another one in 22 May 2020, for these names of the subject's great-great-grandparents are trivial, but Misplaced Pages is not a genealogy database.
Ancestors of Marie Antoinette |
---|
2001:4451:824F:B700:10CD:87C9:EEE7:A19C (talk) 07:36, 15 July 2023 (UTC)
References
- Les ancêtres de Marie-Antoinette d'Autriche (in French). Paris: Editions généalogique de la Voûte. 2006. ISBN 9782847663266.
- Support inclusion I don't see how this is trivia. Genealogy is important for the understanding of the interconnectedness of European states at the time. And given how Marie Antoinette ended it is also relevant to reactions of other states to the French revolution. Also a lot of articles have these and I believe that a lot of people expect this information to be available in the article. -- Random person no 362478479 (talk) 14:36, 15 July 2023 (UTC)
- Support For reasons above. I dont think the information is trivial, especially for someone of Marie Antionettes status. EmilySarah99 (talk) 00:41, 16 July 2023 (UTC)
- Support inclusion Genealogy is not trivia, it is a core element of history. Dimadick (talk) 02:55, 16 July 2023 (UTC)
- Support inclusion, genealogy of members of ruling houses isn't trivia, but an important piece of information.Marcelus (talk) 07:46, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
- Support inclusion. Genealogy is central to understanding historic European royals and their interests. If this was an article about some scientist or popstar then we might dismiss their hitherto-unknown grandparents as trivia, but when they're Holy Roman Emperors, and when that ancestry led directly to Marie Antoinette's role in life (and her notability), that would be foolish. bobrayner (talk) 20:24, 23 July 2023 (UTC)
- Old requests for peer review
- All unassessed articles
- B-Class biography articles
- B-Class biography (politics and government) articles
- High-importance biography (politics and government) articles
- Politics and government work group articles
- B-Class biography (royalty) articles
- High-importance biography (royalty) articles
- Royalty work group articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- B-Class France articles
- Top-importance France articles
- All WikiProject France pages
- B-Class Women's History articles
- High-importance Women's History articles
- All WikiProject Women-related pages
- WikiProject Women's History articles
- B-Class Austria articles
- Top-importance Austria articles
- All WikiProject Austria pages
- B-Class former country articles
- B-Class Holy Roman Empire articles
- Top-importance Holy Roman Empire articles
- Holy Roman Empire task force articles
- WikiProject Former countries articles
- B-Class politics articles
- Top-importance politics articles
- WikiProject Politics articles
- Misplaced Pages requests for comment