This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Super Dromaeosaurus (talk | contribs) at 22:18, 24 July 2023. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 22:18, 24 July 2023 by Super Dromaeosaurus (talk | contribs)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
 | Romania Project‑class | |||||||||
| ||||||||||
 | Combined search for Romania noticeboard and WikiProject archives Discussion of Romania-related topics has been split between this page and WP:RWNB plus its talk page. This box searches the archives of all those pages. | |
 | Merged noticeboard archives: no archives yet (create). Noticeboard talk archives: no archives yet (create). WikiProject talk page archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8. |
|
Archives |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 60 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 10 sections are present. |
Balkan Latinity WikiProject
Hello, I've been thinking for a while of an idea for a new and certainly needed WikiProject. The Aromanians/Vlachs, Megleno-Romanians/Meglenites and Istro-Romanians/Ćiribirci are poorly known peoples in the Balkans, the only ones that are Romance-speaking apart of the Romanians. Tagging pages related to these with WikiProject templates can turn problematic, see this talk page for example , saturated with 7 different templates. I was thus thinking that giving them their own WikiProject could increase organization on Misplaced Pages about info on these peoples and increase their representation in the project, perhaps even attracting members of these groups into working at Misplaced Pages. The project could be split into three task forces for each of the three.
If you're interested, please ping me here or message me on my talk page. Expressing your interest in the existence of such a project is enough, you will not be compromised or pressured into working in a topic area you might lose interest to soon. After (if) I recruit enough support, I will start a formal proposal and ping you there. Regards, Super Ψ Dro 20:51, 27 May 2022 (UTC)
- @Super DromaeosaurusI'm still brand new at attempting to edit anything here, but I'm happy to help if I can. I can help with cleaning up some of the Greek language pages, so they're to the standard you'd expect to see on Misplaced Pages and not "my papou forgot what century it was & is ranting at the wall" Vialitsa (talk) 11:16, 11 March 2023 (UTC)
- Vialitsa, any help is welcome. For now, you can support this project by voting for its creation here . Once it is created it will be easier to give more aims and directions to members of the project. Super Ψ Dro 11:22, 11 March 2023 (UTC)
- Oh perfect, I'm getting up to speed with the contributor standards & how to navigate! Vialitsa (talk) 12:36, 11 March 2023 (UTC)
- Vialitsa, any help is welcome. For now, you can support this project by voting for its creation here . Once it is created it will be easier to give more aims and directions to members of the project. Super Ψ Dro 11:22, 11 March 2023 (UTC)
Thought on categories Eastern Orthodoxy /Far-right/ Iron guard
Currently is treated as a subset of . This maybe somehow confusing when dealing with the odd Catholic member of the Iron Guard... I would have maybe created as an intersection of two distinct sets: and . It's not that big a deal... just a thought... Plinul cel tanar (talk) 08:00, 21 September 2022 (UTC)
- Could be a bit excessive and specific in my opinion. I think a better option could be to also include a Catholic and far-right politics category if there is any. Super Ψ Dro 16:27, 22 September 2022 (UTC)
- It might be too specific, granted... On the other hand the the category would have a main article (Relationship between the Romanian Orthodox Church and the Iron Guard) and, potentially, on the long term, dozens of articles given the huge number of clergymen to have been active in the organization. As wikipedia taxonomy stands now, any article is automatically in a subset of including the one about the Greek-Catholic Ion Gavrilă Ogoranu. Plinul cel tanar (talk) 17:06, 22 September 2022 (UTC)
Requested move at Talk:Moscopole#Requested_move_9_October_2022
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Moscopole#Requested_move_9_October_2022 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject.Alexikoua (talk) 00:30, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
Borat at FAR
I have nominated Borat for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" in regards to the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Wretchskull (talk) 18:20, 16 October 2022 (UTC)
Hello, I would like to join the Project Romania
Hello, I would like to join the project, how do I join? I can contribute a lot to history as I'm a student looking to become a historian. — Preceding unsigned comment added by QuidditchCup53 (talk • contribs) 18:36, 16 December 2022 (UTC)
Radu Dan Constantinescu
Radu Dan Constantinescu was created for pay. It seems like the topic is non-notable, but I think it would be better if someone could check local sources, including offline work and clean-up it a bit. Thank you. 74.15.64.107 (talk) 23:01, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
Survey at Catholic Church in Romania
There is a survey at Talk:Catholic_Church_in_Romania#Survey that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. — Biruitorul 06:33, 29 March 2023 (UTC)
FAR for Regulamentul Organic
User:Buidhe has nominated Regulamentul Organic for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" in regards to the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:36, 8 April 2023 (UTC)
Project-independent quality assessments
Quality assessments by Misplaced Pages editors rate articles in terms of completeness, organization, prose quality, sourcing, etc. Most wikiprojects follow the general guidelines at Misplaced Pages:Content assessment, but some have specialized assessment guidelines. A recent Village pump proposal was approved and has been implemented to add a |class= parameter to {{WikiProject banner shell}}, which can display a general quality assessment for an article, and to let project banner templates "inherit" this assessment.
No action is required if your wikiproject follows the standard assessment approach. Over time, quality assessments will be migrated up to {{WikiProject banner shell}}, and your project banner will automatically "inherit" any changes to the general assessments for the purpose of assigning categories.
However, if your project has decided to "opt out" and follow a non-standard quality assessment approach, all you have to do is modify your wikiproject banner template to pass {{WPBannerMeta}} a new |QUALITY_CRITERIA=custom parameter. If this is done, changes to the general quality assessment will be ignored, and your project-level assessment will be displayed and used to create categories, as at present. Aymatth2 (talk) 13:41, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
Good article reassessment for Battle of Baia
Battle of Baia has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Hog Farm Talk 21:42, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
Categories: