Misplaced Pages

Talk:Pandigital number

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk | contribs) at 20:57, 12 August 2023 (Adding {{WikiProject banner shell}} (Task 19)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 20:57, 12 August 2023 by Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk | contribs) (Adding {{WikiProject banner shell}} (Task 19))(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
This article has not yet been rated on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.

Too complicated

This is unneccesarily complex. Could the author, or someone who understands what is being discussed simplify the text. Thanks, Theonlyedge 21:18, 16 February 2006 (UTC)

Could you be a little more specific as to what makes you think the article is "unneccesarily complex"? I know summation notation (mathematical formulas using the Greek letter Σ) can look scary to some people, but I thought that the listing of actual pandigital numbers (12345678900, 12345678901, etc.) made the concept more understandable, and I actually worried that the ideas might be so simple and obvious as to appear condescending. PrimeFan 22:08, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
i think Theonlyedge probly read a random paragraph in the middle, or fixated on that compilcated looking formula and said "too complex". If you read hte article from the begining, its "too simple"! Numerao 23:37, 18 February 2006 (UTC)

This is honestly retarded. This is like saying a straight in poker is mathamatically important. AtrusRand —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.88.251.198 (talk) 09:28, 16 October 2007 (UTC)


Error in number 987654521, should be 987654321


The number 1234567890 does NOT have all digits in order (unless you mean modulo 10). 84.196.254.9 (talk) 12:33, 11 February 2009 (UTC)

Category: