This is an old revision of this page, as edited by MediationBot1 (talk | contribs) at 16:16, 23 March 2007 (Mediation notification). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 16:16, 23 March 2007 by MediationBot1 (talk | contribs) (Mediation notification)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
|
1 2 3 4 |
5 6 7 8 |
Sockpuppetry
Who to who? --David Shankbone 14:15, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
- It's understandable. You know, I have moments in my history where I got out of hand, or was too emotional in my editing, but I always recognized it. I certainly wasn't fooling myself. It's amazing when people can't see their own behavior. As if a Talk page of warnings, blocks and responses full of snide, defensive remarks isn't evidence enough... Hopefully Ivo will make some good edits. He seems pretty reasonable. But there are now 9 editors in support...this doesn't seem to be all the controversial except for one persistent editor who can't keep his finger off the "Refresh" button for his watchlist. Even other editors who initially seemed to voice lukewarm support for his position have backed away, likely due to his war cries. <sigh> --David Shankbone 14:54, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
I dare you to propose this sentence for the lead in the Buchanan article: James Buchanan (April 23, 1791 – June 1, 1868), also known as Aunt Fancy, was the 15th president of the United States (1857–1861).
LOL - --David Shankbone 03:16, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
RfA
Thanks for updating the count which I forgot to do. Chrislintott 11:14, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
I can't keep secrets!
After looking at your User page, I have a gift coming your way, but I'm horrible at keeping these things in - never tell me anything you don't want others to know! Let's hope it happens...read below:
from "Cynspr@aol.com" <Cynspr@aol.com> to davidshankbone@gmail.com date Mar 21, 2007 5:39 PM subject Re: Daniel Rodriguez Misplaced Pages Shoot It would be New York/Staten Island - Daniel is performing at the Nicks Game March 28 and Rangers April 1 I will ask him to pick a date and a place to see if what works for you Cynthia
--David Shankbone 03:14, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
- Oh my, David! That would be so cool!!!!!!!!!! If it does happen, please tell him you know somebody who worked hard on his Misplaced Pages biography!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! You get to meet the most fabulous people! Jeffpw 07:59, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
K. Scott Bailey
- K. Scott BaileyI've told you once to stay the hell off my page, and now I am saying it more bluntly: FUCK OFF FROM MY PAGE. Further contact here will be considered harassment and will be dealt with as such. Jeffpw 09:06, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
so...
Do you want to request the checkuser, or should I? — coelacan — 08:55, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
- I do so hate admin chores, Coelacan, and you're so much better at that sort of thing:-)....which reminds me: why haven't you made a grab for the mop and vaporizer yet? (and I miss the pretty líl kittycat on my page). Jeffpw 08:57, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
- Eh, mop, I will when I feel like I need it. I'll go do the checkuser request. It was the "I used to edit wikipedia articles, but left because of user abuse. I myself have been subjected to attack by the LGBT community because of differences of opinion on religious issues" that suggested it to you, yes? — coelacan — 09:08, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
- Where the hell are all these cat pictures coming from?! And how cat expressions are there?! Dev920 (Have a nice day!) 09:10, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
- Yup, that was it. Couldn't be more obvious to me. I suppose it might be rjb, but that would surprise me more. But it is an obvious sockpuppet in either case. I note he has put that offensive userpage back up. By the way, nice kitty. :-) Jeffpw 09:11, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
- Rbj is not banned or blocked and so would have no reason to sock. Those statements are really not Rbj's style either; he's not weird like that. Dev: I get them from Commons:Cats and its categories. =) — coelacan — 09:34, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
- Yup, that was it. Couldn't be more obvious to me. I suppose it might be rjb, but that would surprise me more. But it is an obvious sockpuppet in either case. I note he has put that offensive userpage back up. By the way, nice kitty. :-) Jeffpw 09:11, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
- Where the hell are all these cat pictures coming from?! And how cat expressions are there?! Dev920 (Have a nice day!) 09:10, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
- Eh, mop, I will when I feel like I need it. I'll go do the checkuser request. It was the "I used to edit wikipedia articles, but left because of user abuse. I myself have been subjected to attack by the LGBT community because of differences of opinion on religious issues" that suggested it to you, yes? — coelacan — 09:08, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
Thanks
For the back-up on the Tara Subkoff page. It's such a typically American fight. Clearly this person hasn't left the country and gone on a public beach, or he wouldn't find breasts so objectionable. Out of 500 photographs I've put on here, four have exposed boobs. But it's a nice little fantasy I have that my $160.00 6 megapixel could actually get me started in a photography career when I "fail out of law school" - LOL! He articulated my deepest, darkest desires and fears so, so well. haha. It's interesting how often people ascribe motivations to other people to justify their own behavior/response. --David Shankbone 13:58, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
Edit summaries
Regardless of how you feel about a user, an edit summary such as this one is HIGHLY inappropriate. You need to remember to stay civil and to not bite the newbies, or anyone for that matter. Veinor 14:03, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
- As stated on ANI, I was polite the first time, but the user is obviously so autistic that plain English failed to penetrate. While my summary may have been uncivil, it at least got the message across. I should add I have never written anything so scathing on Wiki before, and I doubt (and hope) I ever will have to again. However, I am the first to admit that I should not edit before the caffeine kicks in. :-)Jeffpw 14:07, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
- Editors are allowed to leave messages on your Talk page; that's what it's for. If you're not interested, then ignore them. It isn't ground for personal attacks that people leave you messages. Personal attacks in edit summaries are taken especially seriously, and I suggest that you not repeat this.
- You've again attacked him above; once more, and I shall block you from editing. --Mel Etitis (Talk) 14:09, 23 March 2007 (UTC
Request for Mediation
A Request for Mediation to which you are a party was not accepted and has been delisted. You can find more information on the mediation subpage, Misplaced Pages:Requests for mediation/ZodiacKillerExternalLinks.
|