This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 213.253.40.254 (talk) at 11:15, 14 July 2003 (rm duplink). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 11:15, 14 July 2003 by 213.253.40.254 (talk) (rm duplink)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Skepticism can mean:
- Philosophical skepticism - a philosophical position in which people chooose to critically examine whether the knowledge and perceptions that they have are actually true, and whether or not on can ever be said to have true knowledge; or
- Scientific skepticism - a scientific, or practical, position in which one does not accept the veracity of claims until solid evidence is produced in accordance with the scientific method.
Scientific skepticism is related to, but not identical to, philosophical skepticism. Many scientists and doctors who are skeptical of claims of the paranormal are nonetheless not adherents of classical philosophical skepticism. When critics of controversial scientific or paranormal claims are said to be skeptical, this only refers to their taking a position of scientific skepticism.
The term skeptic is now usually used to mean a person who is taking a critical position in a given situation, usually by employing the principles of critical thinking and the scientific method (that is, scientific skepticism) to evaluate the validity of claims and practices.
Skeptics are often confused with, or even denounced as, cynics. The truth, however, is that valid skeptical criticism (as opposed to arbitrary or subjective misgivings for an idea) strictly originates from an objective and methodological examination that is often agreed between skeptics themselves.
A debunker is a skeptic who pursues the disproof of false claims.