This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Jimbo Wales (talk | contribs) at 13:22, 8 September 2023 (→Edit filter change for your user page?). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 13:22, 8 September 2023 by Jimbo Wales (talk | contribs) (→Edit filter change for your user page?)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
| Welcome to my talk page. Please sign and date your entries by inserting ~~~~ at the end. Start a new talk topic. |
 | Jimbo welcomes your comments and updates – he has an open door policy. He holds the founder's seat on the Wikimedia Foundation's Board of Trustees. The current trustees occupying "community-selected" seats are Rosiestep, Laurentius, Victoria and Pundit. The Wikimedia Foundation's Lead Manager of Trust and Safety is Jan Eissfeldt. |
| This page is semi-protected and you will not be able to leave a message here unless you are a registered editor. Instead, you can leave a message here |
 | This user talk page might be watched by friendly talk page stalkers, which means that someone other than me might reply to your query. Their input is welcome and their help with messages that I cannot reply to quickly is appreciated. |
 | This talkpage has been mentioned by a media organization:
|
Centralized discussion
- AI-generated images depicting living people
- Blocks for promotional activity outside of mainspace
- Voluntary RfAs after resignation
- Proposed rewrite of WP:BITE
- LLM/chatbot comments in discussions
Wiki ai
Why dont we create an ai that runs on wikipedia article for information i know that vandalism and false information may come up but ai is more of a closed development community but taking good wikipedia artcles parsing data from them to answer a specific question instead of looking for them could lift the very long articles which are hard to find specific information and make it easier for ordinary users scouting for info one thing i would be worried about is the current political situation with ai,current events,blp’s especially politicians. take this with a grain of salt •Cyberwolf• 14:36, 25 August 2023 (UTC)
- The machine learning / AI team at the Foundation is exploring all options around this. The new technology is super exciting in terms of the potential!--Jimbo Wales (talk) 15:09, 25 August 2023 (UTC)
- Any implementation should be done so very carefully with much error on the side of caution. Its potential may be good but this seems another area where a possible foundation override of English Misplaced Pages decisions may come into play. Randy Kryn (talk) 15:14, 25 August 2023 (UTC)
- Yes i really dont think any overrides will be needed due to page parsing and Misplaced Pages is also used when you ask questions in google but still as i said take this with a grain of salt •Cyberwolf• 15:43, 25 August 2023 (UTC)
- I would recommend the ai to cite sources when asked •Cyberwolf• 16:07, 25 August 2023 (UTC)
- Jimbo can i help i would prefer a testing position but any would do •Cyberwolf• 17:17, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
- Any implementation should be done so very carefully with much error on the side of caution. Its potential may be good but this seems another area where a possible foundation override of English Misplaced Pages decisions may come into play. Randy Kryn (talk) 15:14, 25 August 2023 (UTC)
- Personally I think automating tasks that are of critical importance to the site with a system that is still in beta is just a recipe for disaster. I am aware Samwalton9 and his team are working on a software level version of Cluebot to help with vandalism, but with writing articles, the human touch is what makes them accurate. Zippybonzo | Talk (he|him) 09:42, 27 August 2023 (UTC)
- Wiki ai is not built to replace human editors
- It's built so people can get answers to questions from a long article in a short time •Cyberwolf• 19:56, 27 August 2023 (UTC)
The Signpost: 31 August 2023
- From the editor: Beta version of signpost.news now online
- News and notes: You like RecentChanges?
- In the media: Taking it sleazy
- Recent research: The five barriers that impede "stitching" collaboration between Commons and Misplaced Pages
- Draftspace: Bad Jokes and Other Draftspace Novelties
- Humour: The Dehumourification Plan
- Traffic report: Raise your drinking glass, here's to yesterday
Edit filter change for your user page?
Hello Jimbo! It's been a long time since I've posted here. I was patrolling edit filter false positive reports today and came across an IP's request related to an edit on your user page. They were blocked by filter 803, the filter that prevents non-confirmed users editing other users' userpages. Your user page invites users to feel free to edit it, although you do mention at the top of the section that editors need to be autoconfirmed first. Would you want your userpage to be exempted from the filter, so that any user can edit it? As far as I know that's technically possible, although I'm not an edit filter manager.
The "false positive" was not constructive so I did not implement it, but I thought I'd ask about the exemption. Cheers! Ivanvector (/Edits) 16:21, 7 September 2023 (UTC)
- To allow any user to edit the page there is a template you would need to add, probably called something like {{user page unblocked}}, but its name escapes me for now. — Qwerfjkltalk 21:03, 7 September 2023 (UTC)
- It was unlocked for a while, until this edit - add that back in to unlock it again. — xaosflux 21:11, 7 September 2023 (UTC)
- I think people who patrol it have asked if kindly it could be left as it is, simply due to not much useful coming in from non-confirmed users, but a lot of nonsense. If I were on here 12 hours a day, I'd probably want to give it a whirl, but I wouldn't want to make work for kind people who are doing the patrolling.--Jimbo Wales (talk) 13:22, 8 September 2023 (UTC)