This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Dolphin51 (talk | contribs) at 02:04, 1 October 2023 (→Reverting to show disapproval of an edit summary: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 02:04, 1 October 2023 by Dolphin51 (talk | contribs) (→Reverting to show disapproval of an edit summary: new section)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)This user talk page might be watched by friendly talk page stalkers, which means that someone other than me might reply to your query. Their input is welcome and their help with messages that I cannot reply to quickly is appreciated. |
Before posting, please read and follow the notes below.
|
Archives |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 14.5 days may be automatically archived by ClueBot III when more than 2 sections are present. |
Edit of https://en.m.wikipedia.org/Helicopter_Interdiction_Tactical_Squadron
Hello Bill. You recently did an edit to the Coast Guard HITRON page I had edited and you stated no source stated. The problem is, the “only” source available are the actual people, such as myself, that actually built the unit up from ground zero. Their were only 10 of us, be happy to have a “second” of one of the other plank owner members back me up on any and all info I add to this page, as, not to boast, I am a subject matter expert on. Please do me the courtesy and contact me direct on this request. I anm older now annd a dinosaur when it comes to a lot of computer and Wiki protocols so please, not to excuse my lack of this knowledge, but trying the best I can do as I always do through a 32yr military career. Appreciate your time. Charlie H10Plank (talk) 02:07, 16 September 2023 (UTC)
Oops
Mixed up the before and after on the Gimli Glider edit. Mea culpa, thanks for the fix. –IagoQnsi (talk) 05:38, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
- No worries. I've mixed up diffs plenty of times myself. At first I wasn't sure what had happened, but once I looked at you userpage, talk page, and recent contributions, I figured it was probably a mistake. I just made my edit as clear as possible (on then second try!), and moved on. I'm glad that you realized your mistake, and that you let me know. Take care. BilCat (talk) 07:23, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
Reverting to show disapproval of an edit summary
Hi BilCat. Around 30 September I edited the caption of an image on Boeing 767. I changed “widebody” to wide-bodied aircraft to match the title of the article; and I added the word “engines” to “turbofans” to make the expression “turbofan engines”. In my edit summary I foolishly used the words “colloquial” and “unencyclopaedic”. Understandably, you disagreed with these descriptors and you objected to my use of these words in my edit summary. You showed your disapproval by reverting my edit.
Are you aware that at WP:BADREVERT it says Do not revert an edit as a means of showing your disapproval of the edit summary?
Misplaced Pages has an article titled Wide-bodied aircraft. This expression appears to be used many hundreds of times throughout Misplaced Pages. Are you proposing a project to erase the word “aircraft” every time it is used in this expression, on the grounds that “widebody” is not unencyclopaedic? Presumably not. Similarly, are you proposing to erase the word “engine(s)” everywhere it is appended to “turbofan”? Again, presumably not. What message, if any, can we derive from your revert? Dolphin (t) 02:04, 1 October 2023 (UTC)