Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license.
Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat.
We can research this topic together.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Nevada, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.NevadaWikipedia:WikiProject NevadaTemplate:WikiProject NevadaNevada
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization
This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.
This article was nominated for deletion on 11 August 2015. The result of the discussion was keep.
The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people, which has been designated as a contentious topic.
@Voorts No, maybe I wasn't clear. In the infobox, the ideology parameter has no source to support the ideologies (see WP:OR). If there are no sources please remove it (this is the edit request). 93.45.229.98 (talk) 13:59, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Reliable sources have described the organization's politics as all of those things, as reflected in the article. There doesn't need to be a citation for every point in the infobox. voorts (talk/contributions) 21:26, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
@Voorts In the article the terms "right-libertarianism," "white supremacy," etc. appear only in the infobox (and in the infobox there are no sources). 93.45.229.98 (talk) 11:55, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
@Voorts Firstly, the sources must be cited in the article (not simply exist outside Misplaced Pages), secondly I can only make editing requests (because the article is protected), and third none of the sources you quoted describe Oath Keepers as "white supremacist."
In the first source "white supremacist group" refers to the Proud Boys; in the second source idem - article speaks of distinct groups KKK or neo-Nazi skinheads (white supremacists) and Three Percenters and Oath Keepers (far-right militias); CSIS article mentions islamophobia and nativism which is different from white supremacism.
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.
I was a juror in the trial of Rhodes, Meggs, Caldwell, Watkins and Harrelson. This topic isn't covered well so there isn't much to edit, but, one thing that is wrong in the Oathkeepers post is that Thomas Caldwell, was not an Oathkeeper, he just knew them and supported them, but if I put on a Ravens Jersey and go to a game, it doesn't mean I'm a Baltimore Raven. Thomas Caldwell met them at a rally in Virginia and allowed them to camp at his farm in Berryville. His only other connection was staying at the same hotel with them and wearing a shirt for a picture on the morning on Jan 6. For the hotel part, he made a reservation there as he lived locally and gave advice to others that it was a good place to stay and those from Florida and Ohio, made a reservation at the same Comfort Inn, he didn't store his weapon with theirs, which according to him was an antique rifle that he brought only to show Ranger Doug. The Oathkeepers have a formal process to join their organization and Thomas Caldwell didn't complete it, he never should have been grouped as a "leader of the organization" and tried with them. I wish we could have found him not guilty of everything but he did go "out of bounds" on capitol grounds so we found him guilty of obstruction of a procedure and he deleted a bunch of Facebook messages the day that Jessica Watkins was contacted by the FBI so we found him guilty of destruction of evidence as from that point he reasonably could have assumed that he was going to be investigated. 216.81.94.73 (talk) 14:33, 25 July 2023 (UTC)
Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. voorts (talk/contributions) 17:39, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
Done