Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Bruce leverett (talk | contribs) at 03:03, 4 January 2024 (→Lead section: Reply). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

	Bertrand Russell was one of the Philosophy and religion good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones Date Process Result July 2, 2005 Featured article candidate Not promoted December 19, 2005 Good article nominee Listed May 25, 2007 Good article reassessment Delisted October 28, 2007 Good article nominee Not listed April 8, 2008 Good article nominee Not listed Current status: Delisted good article

This  level-4 vital article is rated B-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects.

Politics of the United Kingdom High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Politics of the United Kingdom on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Politics of the United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomPolitics of the United Kingdom High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. More information: /  This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter. Linguistics: Theoretical Linguistics / Philosophy of language Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Linguistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of linguistics on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LinguisticsWikipedia:WikiProject LinguisticsTemplate:WikiProject LinguisticsLinguistics Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by Theoretical Linguistics Task Force. This article is supported by Philosophy of language task force. Philosophy: Philosophers / Metaphysics / Epistemology / Logic / Social and political / Science / Language / Analytic / Contemporary High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Misplaced Pages.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. Associated task forces: /  Philosophers Metaphysics Epistemology Logic Social and political philosophy Philosophy of science Philosophy of language Analytic philosophy Contemporary philosophy Mathematics Top‑priority This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mathematics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mathematics on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MathematicsWikipedia:WikiProject MathematicsTemplate:WikiProject Mathematicsmathematics Top This article has been rated as Top-priority on the project's priority scale. Biography: Peerage and Baronetage / Science and Academia This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Misplaced Pages's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography This article is supported by WikiProject Peerage and Baronetage (assessed as High-importance). This article is supported by the science and academia work group (assessed as High-importance). Chicago Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chicago, which aims to improve all articles or pages related to Chicago or the Chicago metropolitan area.ChicagoWikipedia:WikiProject ChicagoTemplate:WikiProject ChicagoChicago Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. California: Los Angeles Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by Los Angeles area task force (assessed as Low-importance). Atheism High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Atheism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of atheism on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AtheismWikipedia:WikiProject AtheismTemplate:WikiProject AtheismAtheism High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. For more information and how you can help, click the link opposite: If you would like to participate, you can edit this article and visit the project page. Quick help Project's main talk page Article layout Links to atheism-related information · List of free online resources Writing about religion · Article development Citing sources · Verifying sources · About original research Assume good faith · Be civil Recent activity Core articles the "Atheism" article Articles recently added to Category:Atheism To do edit history watch purge Join WikiProject atheism and be bold. Add a userbox to your page ({{User WikiProject Atheism}} or {{User WPA2}}) and attract potential members. Help with articles. See this month's adopt-an-article. Help out with this to-do list. Be consistent Use a "standard" layout for atheism-related articles (see layout style, "The perfect article" and Featured articles). Add Atheism info box to all atheism related talk pages (use {{WikiProject Atheism}} or see info box) Ensure atheism-related articles are members of Atheism by checking whether ] has been added to atheism-related articles – and, where it hasn't, adding it. Maintenance, etc. Find sources for all positions of an article (see Citing sources and atheism references). Try to expand stubs. Ideas and theories about life, however, are prone to generating neologisms, so some stubs may be suitable for deletion (see deletion process). Watch the list of atheism-related articles and add to accordingly. Always write for an encyclopedia. Articles to improve Agnosticism Create Articles on notable atheists Expand an atheism stub Immediate attention State atheism needs a reassessment of its Importance level, as it has little to do with atheism and is instead an article about anti-theist/anti-religious actions of governments. False choice into False dilemma: discuss whether you are for or against this merge here Clarify references in Atheism using footnotes. Secular movement defines it as a being restricted to America in the 21st century. Sociology High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sociology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sociology on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SociologyWikipedia:WikiProject SociologyTemplate:WikiProject Sociologysociology High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. Socialism High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Socialism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of socialism on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SocialismWikipedia:WikiProject SocialismTemplate:WikiProject Socialismsocialism High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Section sizes Section size for Bertrand Russell (35 sections) Section name Byte count Section total (Top) 12,150 12,150 Biography 14 90,960 Early life and background 5,575 5,575 Childhood and adolescence 7,455 7,455 Education 1,434 1,434 Early career 5,805 5,805 First World War 7,132 7,132 G. H. Hardy on the Trinity controversy 2,633 2,633 Between the wars 12,778 12,778 Second World War 5,794 5,794 Later life 14,117 14,117 Political causes 12,891 12,891 Final years, death and legacy 9,861 15,332 Marriages and issue 5,471 5,471 Titles, awards and honours 540 3,036 Honours and Awards 552 552 Scholastic 1,944 1,944 Views 40 21,036 Philosophy 3,264 3,264 Religion 2,311 2,311 Society 10,956 10,956 Freedom of opinion and expression 819 819 Education 3,646 3,646 Selected works 16,812 16,812 See also 489 489 Notes 26 26 References 185 1,117 Citations 29 29 General and cited sources 34 903 Primary sources 486 486 Secondary sources 383 383 Further reading 302 3,557 Books about Russell's philosophy 1,307 1,307 Biographical books 1,948 1,948 External links 6,432 6,432 Total 155,615 155,615

Archives

1, 2, 3, 4

This page has archives. Sections older than 183 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present.

I am sure his ignorant antisemitism is mentioned somewhere ...

... but I can't find it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.21.84.208 (talk) 17:45, 2 November 2023 (UTC)

Minor edit suggestion: 1916 fine of £100 in today's value seems incorrect

The 1916 fine amount is correct, but I think the recalculation for today should be closer to £2700. This just stands out because £7000 seemed vastly off.

Chamblis (talk) 15:57, 20 August 2022 (UTC)

I checked the Bank of England site, and I am wrong. It is close to the article’s original. BOE says 6000.

Chamblis (talk) 12:35, 8 September 2022 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

• Bertrand Russell leads anti-nuclear march in London, Feb 1961.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 11:52, 2 January 2023 (UTC)

Lead section

The lead section was recently trimmed here with the edit summary "Because these are the areas that he is most well-known of. Don't dilute the focus of the article with so many qualifiers". I'm not sure some of the key areas of Russell's work can simply be discarded from the lead so easily. What do other editors think? Thanks Martinevans123 (talk) 15:23, 1 January 2024 (UTC)

The relevant policy is in MOS:LEAD, and for convenience, I will quote the parts I like best here, though most of you are already familiar with this:

The average Misplaced Pages visit is a few minutes long. The lead is the first thing most people will read upon arriving at an article, and may be the only portion of the article that they read. It gives the basics in a nutshell and cultivates interest in reading on—though not by teasing the reader or hinting at what follows. It should be written in a clear, accessible style with a neutral point of view.

The lead should stand on its own as a concise overview of the article's topic. It should identify the topic, establish context, explain why the topic is notable, and summarize the most important points, including any prominent controversies. The notability of the article's subject is usually established in the first few sentences. As in the body of the article itself, the emphasis given to material in the lead should roughly reflect its importance to the topic, according to reliable, published sources. Apart from basic facts, significant information should not appear in the lead if it is not covered in the remainder of the article.

Let's look at some of the wikilinks trimmed in turn.

Logic: Russell's co-authorship of Principia Mathematica is discussed in the Early Career section, so it can certainly be mentioned in the lead paragraphs, even in the first paragraph. I would draw your attention, however, to the fact that "logic" appeared twice in the first paragraph and four times in the second paragraph before the trim. Could this be rewritten to be less repetitious?

Set theory: Russell's paradox is discussed in the Early career section, so it can certainly be mentioned in the lead paragraphs, even in the first paragraph. In the Early career section, could it clarify things to rearrange the text to explicitly call Russell's paradox a set-theoretic paradox?

Artificial intelligence: This field of study is not mentioned anywhere in this article. Thus, it is certainly a no-no to mention it in the lead paragraphs, let alone in the first paragraph.

Computer science: This field of study is mentioned in only one place in the article, in the See Also section. As with artificial intelligence, we cannot bring up computer science in the lead paragraphs until and unless we have established in the body of the article that Russell made an acknowledged contribution to computer science. By the way, I have to be skeptical of the entry for Russell in List of pioneers in computer science, as it does not cite any sources. Even if (for example) type systems were described in Principia Mathematica, and type systems are used in computer science, it is WP:SYNTH to infer from these two facts that Russell made a contribution to computer science. For us to state that, we must have a reliable source stating that Russell made an acknowledged contribution to computer science.

Cognitive science: Same as with Artificial intelligence.

You get the idea? The first paragraph is not the place to make unsubstantiated claims about Russell. Everything in the lead paragraphs has to be substantiated, with cited sources, in the main body of the article; and everything in the first paragraph in particular, has in addition to be crucial to the article, as it may be the only thing someone reads when they (first) visit this article. Bruce leverett (talk) 03:30, 2 January 2024 (UTC)

Thanks for that critique. I was expecting a reply from User:CactiStaccingCrane. Perhaps a slightly longer edit summary might have helped? Martinevans123 (talk) 08:50, 2 January 2024 (UTC)

So do you think any of those should be replaced in the first paragraph? Thanks. Martinevans123 (talk) 19:03, 3 January 2024 (UTC)

The bold thing for me to do would have been to just add back logic and set theory, and maybe one or more of the branches of philosophy (I haven't looked at them more closely). But I am not a Russell expert, and I wanted to see if other editors would want to argue about this, and also, I have been kind of busy in real life, so I held off. But I will get to it by and by, unless somebody gets there first. Bruce leverett (talk) 03:03, 4 January 2024 (UTC)

• Delisted good articles
• Former good article nominees
• B-Class level-4 vital articles
• Misplaced Pages level-4 vital articles in People
• B-Class vital articles in People
• B-Class Politics of the United Kingdom articles
• High-importance Politics of the United Kingdom articles
• B-Class Linguistics articles
• Mid-importance Linguistics articles
• B-Class Theoretical Linguistics articles
• Theoretical Linguistics Task Force articles
• B-Class philosophy of language articles
• Philosophy of language task force articles
• WikiProject Linguistics articles
• B-Class Philosophy articles
• High-importance Philosophy articles
• B-Class philosopher articles
• High-importance philosopher articles
• Philosophers task force articles
• B-Class metaphysics articles
• High-importance metaphysics articles
• Metaphysics task force articles
• B-Class epistemology articles
• High-importance epistemology articles
• Epistemology task force articles
• B-Class logic articles
• High-importance logic articles
• Logic task force articles
• B-Class social and political philosophy articles
• High-importance social and political philosophy articles
• Social and political philosophy task force articles
• B-Class philosophy of science articles
• High-importance philosophy of science articles
• Philosophy of science task force articles
• High-importance philosophy of language articles
• B-Class Analytic philosophy articles
• High-importance Analytic philosophy articles
• Analytic philosophy task force articles
• B-Class Contemporary philosophy articles
• High-importance Contemporary philosophy articles
• Contemporary philosophy task force articles
• B-Class mathematics articles
• Top-priority mathematics articles
• B-Class biography articles
• B-Class biography (peerage) articles
• High-importance biography (peerage) articles
• Peerage and Baronetage work group articles
• B-Class biography (science and academia) articles
• High-importance biography (science and academia) articles
• Science and academia work group articles
• WikiProject Biography articles
• B-Class Chicago articles
• Low-importance Chicago articles
• WikiProject Chicago articles
• B-Class California articles
• Low-importance California articles
• B-Class Los Angeles articles
• Low-importance Los Angeles articles
• Los Angeles area task force articles
• WikiProject California articles
• B-Class Atheism articles
• High-importance Atheism articles
• B-Class sociology articles
• High-importance sociology articles
• B-Class socialism articles
• High-importance socialism articles
• WikiProject Socialism articles