This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Cewbot (talk | contribs) at 02:47, 12 January 2024 (Maintain {{WPBS}} and vital articles: 2 WikiProject templates. Merge {{VA}} into {{WPBS}}. Keep majority rating "B" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 2 same ratings as {{WPBS}} in {{WikiProject History}}, {{WikiProject Alternative Views}}.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 02:47, 12 January 2024 by Cewbot (talk | contribs) (Maintain {{WPBS}} and vital articles: 2 WikiProject templates. Merge {{VA}} into {{WPBS}}. Keep majority rating "B" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 2 same ratings as {{WPBS}} in {{WikiProject History}}, {{WikiProject Alternative Views}}.)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Historical revisionism article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2, 3 |
This level-5 vital article is rated B-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Interpretation
@Beyond My Ken: This might be better as a Wiktionary link, ], rather than as one to a DAB page full of irrelevant entries relating to music, painting, languages, the law, mathematics, and so on. What do you think? Narky Blert (talk) 16:00, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
- Well, if you want to, but I really don;t think anything is necessary. Beyond My Ken (talk) 16:17, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
- B-Class level-5 vital articles
- Misplaced Pages level-5 vital articles in History
- B-Class vital articles in History
- B-Class history articles
- High-importance history articles
- History articles needing attention
- WikiProject History articles
- B-Class Alternative views articles
- Unknown-importance Alternative views articles
- WikiProject Alternative views articles