This is an old revision of this page, as edited by A. B. (talk | contribs) at 06:37, 25 January 2024 (→26 Romanian gas field articles proposed for deletion: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 06:37, 25 January 2024 by A. B. (talk | contribs) (→26 Romanian gas field articles proposed for deletion: new section)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Romania Project‑class | ||||||||||
|
Combined search for Romania noticeboard and WikiProject archives Discussion of Romania-related topics has been split between this page and WP:RWNB plus its talk page. This box searches the archives of all those pages. |
Merged noticeboard archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11. Noticeboard talk archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9. WikiProject talk page archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8. |
Project-independent quality assessments
Quality assessments by Misplaced Pages editors rate articles in terms of completeness, organization, prose quality, sourcing, etc. Most wikiprojects follow the general guidelines at Misplaced Pages:Content assessment, but some have specialized assessment guidelines. A recent Village pump proposal was approved and has been implemented to add a |class=
parameter to {{WikiProject banner shell}}, which can display a general quality assessment for an article, and to let project banner templates "inherit" this assessment.
No action is required if your wikiproject follows the standard assessment approach. Over time, quality assessments will be migrated up to {{WikiProject banner shell}}, and your project banner will automatically "inherit" any changes to the general assessments for the purpose of assigning categories.
However, if your project has decided to "opt out" and follow a non-standard quality assessment approach, all you have to do is modify your wikiproject banner template to pass {{WPBannerMeta}} a new |QUALITY_CRITERIA=custom
parameter. If this is done, changes to the general quality assessment will be ignored, and your project-level assessment will be displayed and used to create categories, as at present. Aymatth2 (talk) 13:41, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
Good article reassessment for Battle of Baia
Battle of Baia has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Hog Farm Talk 21:42, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
Requested move at Talk:Ordinariate for Catholics of Armenian Rite in Romania#Requested move 25 August 2023
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Ordinariate for Catholics of Armenian Rite in Romania#Requested move 25 August 2023 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. —usernamekiran (talk) 14:28, 3 September 2023 (UTC)
Lake or Lacul?
Do we replace Lacul with Lake? Xx236 (talk) 08:54, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
- Lake for actual lakes, Lacul for untranslatable names (e.g. Lacu Sărat). Super Dromaeosaurus (talk) 09:00, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
Women in Green's 5th Edit-a-thon
Hello WikiProject Romania:
WikiProject Women in Green is holding a month-long Good Article Edit-a-thon event in October 2023!
Running from October 1 to 31, 2023, WikiProject Women in Green (WiG) is hosting a Good Article (GA) edit-a-thon event with the theme Around the World in 31 Days! All experience levels welcome. Never worked on a GA project before? We'll teach you how to get started. Or maybe you're an old hand at GAs – we'd love to have you involved! Participants are invited to work on nominating and/or reviewing GA submissions related to women and women's works (e.g., books, films) during the event period. We hope to collectively cover article subjects from at least 31 countries (or broader international articles) by month's end. GA resources and one-on-one support will be provided by experienced GA editors, and participants will have the opportunity to earn a special WiG barnstar for their efforts.
We hope to see you there!
Grnrchst (talk) 13:37, 21 September 2023 (UTC)PCR women's organizations
There's a merge discussion at Talk:Union of Antifascist Women of Romania, at which it would be great to have Romanian expertise :) Dsp13 (talk) 12:44, 1 October 2023 (UTC)
Byzantine Empire Featured article review
I have nominated Byzantine Empire for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" in regards to the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:05, 30 October 2023 (UTC)
Requested move at Talk:Stadionul Cimentul#Requested move 19 January 2024
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Stadionul Cimentul#Requested move 19 January 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 21:58, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
Requested move at Talk:AS Cimentul Fieni#Requested move 19 January 2024
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:AS Cimentul Fieni#Requested move 19 January 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 21:59, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
Requested move at Talk:ACS Hușana Huși#Requested move 19 January 2024
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:ACS Hușana Huși#Requested move 19 January 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 22:51, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
26 Romanian gas field articles proposed for deletion
One editor has been proposing many gas field articles for deletion over the last few days. Articles are tagged as non-notable with bad references.
Merging content into List of natural gas fields in Romania is a potential alternative to deletion.
You're invited to look at these and see what should be done. If you have refs you can add, that would be helpful.
If you agree or disagree with deletion, there are instructions on the deletion notice for what to do.
Here's the current list:
- Bianca gas field (via WP:PROD)
- Brădești gas field (via WP:PROD)
- Clara gas field (via WP:PROD)
- Daia gas field (via WP:PROD)
- Filitelnic gas field (via WP:PROD)
- Frasin-Gura Humorului gas field (via WP:PROD)
- Ghindăoani gas field (via WP:PROD)
- Mănești-Vlădeni gas field (via WP:PROD)
- Maria gas field (via WP:PROD)
- Miorița gas field (via WP:PROD)
- Muridava gas field (via WP:PROD)
- Nadia gas field (via WP:PROD)
- Noul Săsesc gas field (via WP:PROD)
- Plenița gas field (via WP:PROD)
- Poduri gas field (via WP:PROD)
- Rodbav gas field (via WP:PROD)
- Roman-Secuieni gas field (via WP:PROD)
- Șamșud gas field (via WP:PROD)
- Sângeorgiu de Pădure gas field (via WP:PROD)
- Șaroș gas field (via WP:PROD)
- Sighișoara gas field (via WP:PROD)
- Șincai gas field (via WP:PROD)
- South Cobălcescu gas field (via WP:PROD)
- Târnăveni gas field (via WP:PROD)
- Teleac gas field (via WP:PROD)
- Torcești gas field (via WP:PROD)
I maintain a running list at User:A. B./Sandbox2 Thanks, --06:37, 25 January 2024 (UTC) A. B. 06:37, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
Categories: