This is the current revision of this page, as edited by Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk | contribs) at 07:54, 3 February 2024 (Implementing WP:PIQA (Task 26)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
Revision as of 07:54, 3 February 2024 by Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk | contribs) (Implementing WP:PIQA (Task 26))(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Short list article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article has not yet been rated on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||
|
long list
I went to Oxford in 1965 and left in 1973 (with BA and DPhil). I have spent most of my life, one way or another, in the academic world. I have never heard the phrase 'long list' and was not aware that it was even a concept, except of course by implication. In fact, I first heard the phrase in German, a language in which as one has sadly become accustomed to hear so many bizarre attempts at using English, the most spectacularly inept of which was the very short-lived 'body bag' to describe a fashion item used mostly by women (Pamour (talk) 15:44, 20 September 2016 (UTC)).
Misplaced Pages is not Wiktionary
That is where the simple definition of the word "shortlist" belongs.
And that's all there is to see here. --Loginnigol 20:16, 21 December 2018 (UTC)
It's terrible. 1 source, deep into an over-weight digression about politics. A coat rack to hang any possible usage of the word short list. A questionable dictionary definition strung out. I am certain some clever journalist or professor has written an essay about shortlists, but where. -- GreenC 04:14, 25 September 2021 (UTC)
Categories: