Talk:Kris Paronto - Misplaced Pages

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by Cewbot (talk | contribs) at 08:59, 7 February 2024 (Maintain {{WPBS}} and vital articles: 2 WikiProject templates. Create {{WPBS}}. Keep majority rating "Stub" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 1 same rating as {{WPBS}} in {{WikiProject Biography}}.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

Revision as of 08:59, 7 February 2024 by Cewbot (talk | contribs) (Maintain {{WPBS}} and vital articles: 2 WikiProject templates. Create {{WPBS}}. Keep majority rating "Stub" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 1 same rating as {{WPBS}} in {{WikiProject Biography}}.)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

This article was nominated for deletion on 8 December 2017. The result of the discussion was keep.

This article is rated Stub-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography: Military

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Misplaced Pages's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article is supported by the military biography work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Military history: Biography / North America / United States / Post-Cold War C‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history

This article has been rated as C-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military biography task force
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force
	Post-Cold War task force

Ancestry

Hello folks, I saw him in a video say he's Mexican. I don't know the right way to put it in the page or if it should be there, but some pages show the parents and nationalities, i.e. "So and so is of Irish and German descent." Here is the video where he says it -> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c8p8-_IHiBg 2001:480:610:241:19FE:7D6C:D47:2D74 (talk) 10:52, 25 July 2018 (UTC)

Notability

At present, the article’s sources are (a) the subject’s CV, (b) a PR piece about a movie, and (c) a press release, un-bylined, from a small town Texas newspaper. He served four years in the U.S. Army, reaching the rank of sergeant -- a fact not mentioned at present in the article. Almost all his press coverage seems to concern his political advocacy. Far from clear that his notability exceeds that of thousands of soldiers and sailors. MarkBernstein (talk) 21:57, 4 December 2017 (UTC)

They made a movie about him and his account. Easily meets GNG. If there are thousands of other soldiers, then please begin writing about them. What even brought you to this article? --DHeyward (talk) 22:52, 4 December 2017 (UTC)

Lead wording

The initial wording in the lead was just changed from "...is an American author and speaker as well as a former U.S. Army Ranger and CIA security contractor" to "...is an American author and speaker. He is also former U.S. Army Ranger and previously worked as CIA security contractor." My personal preference is for the first version. It seems to me that the description should be in one sentence, that "is also" is usually always a bad choice for encyclopedic tone, and that "former" speaks to his career as a Ranger and CIA contractor. Having two sentences describing who he is looks clumsy to me as well as the new wording. Thoughts? -- ψλ ● ✉ ✓ 19:58, 10 December 2017 (UTC)

Pinging editors with the most and most recent edits to the article for to notify of this discussion: DHeyward, Lacypaperclip, Sabbatino, CAPTAIN RAJU, Ammarpad. -- ψλ ● ✉ ✓ 00:06, 11 December 2017 (UTC)

The above has been here, awaiting comment, for four days now. Since there's seemingly no objection to the former version (or just no interest one way or the other), I will be changing it back to what it was previously. -- ψλ ● ✉ ✓ 14:25, 14 December 2017 (UTC)

Categories: