This is the current revision of this page, as edited by Cewbot (talk | contribs) at 02:45, 13 February 2024 (Maintain {{WPBS}}: 3 WikiProject templates. Keep majority rating "Stub" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 3 same ratings as {{WPBS}} in {{WikiProject Connecticut}}, {{WikiProject Companies}}, {{WikiProject Energy}}.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
Revision as of 02:45, 13 February 2024 by Cewbot (talk | contribs) (Maintain {{WPBS}}: 3 WikiProject templates. Keep majority rating "Stub" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 3 same ratings as {{WPBS}} in {{WikiProject Connecticut}}, {{WikiProject Companies}}, {{WikiProject Energy}}.)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Connecticut Natural Gas article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Stub-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Untitled header
This article originally redirected to UIL Holdings Corporation, this company's corporate parent. This redirect has been removed and a unique article has been created for Connecticut Natural Gas. Disclosure of conflict-of-interest editing: Please note that this editor is an employee of UIL Holdings Corporation. I am adding this information with authorization of my company, in the interest of creating a complete and factually accurate article. I am attempting to abide by the Misplaced Pages Terms of Use, and to remain neutral in tone; however, I expect that the Misplaced Pages community will help to ensure that this page remains up-to-date, balanced and complete.Edwardjcrowder (talk) 15:56, 9 August 2011 (UTC)
undue
Seems a bit like that (especially with the random mention of Tomasso Group). Also, I added some info about CNG's union. Further reading for future reference: here. –MJL ‐Talk‐ 14:52, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
- I don’t think we have a weight issue, we just have an article whose core is so anemic and under sourced that any paragraph sized addition is going to look disproportionate. Horse Eye Jack (talk) 15:49, 16 May 2020 (UTC)