Misplaced Pages

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by Cewbot (talk | contribs) at 20:04, 13 February 2024 (Maintain {{WPBS}}: 2 WikiProject templates. Keep majority rating "Start" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 2 same ratings as {{WPBS}} in {{WikiProject Shopping Centers}}, {{WikiProject Devon}}.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

This article was nominated for deletion on 3 November 2007. The result of the discussion was no consensus.

This article is rated Start-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Shopping Centers Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Shopping Centers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of enclosed shopping malls, outdoor shopping centers, and dead malls on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Shopping CentersWikipedia:WikiProject Shopping CentersTemplate:WikiProject Shopping CentersShopping center Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Devon Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Devon, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Devon on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DevonWikipedia:WikiProject DevonTemplate:WikiProject DevonDevon Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Website

I cannot revert Whiteworks i.e. add the link to the website back, because it is blacklisted. Please can a sysop do this for me. Jolly Ω Janner 13:45, 31 December 2008 (UTC)

It's blacklisted locally. It does appear to be appropriate to have that URL there: it's the official website (as far as I can tell) of the topic of the page and the infobox has a field specifically designed for such URLs so clearly it's normal to have them. However, the site is used problematically on other pages. I don't know how narrowly it can be whitelisted. Waiting for input from admin who blacklisted it... DMacks (talk) 05:42, 6 January 2009 (UTC)

Sorry - no longer an admin so can't help. It was being spammed across many pages at one stage so if it were me I would not de-list it. Not as though it is vital to the project! --Herby 08:37, 6 January 2009 (UTC)

Concurred it's not critical here...much ado about little? If you feel strongly it should be added, WP:SBL is the place to request. Make sure to cross-link the discussion here<->there so we can track this, given the nature of the sock-drawer that lurks here. DMacks (talk) 10:16, 6 January 2009 (UTC)

It's already started being discussed at MediaWiki talk:Spam-blacklist#www.drakecircus.com, though a few extra voices couldn't harm. --WebHamster 12:39, 6 January 2009 (UTC)

For clarity - it was me who actually listed it having got p*ssed off reverting it in a multitude of strange places (including IIRC my own user page!). --Herby 12:41, 6 January 2009 (UTC)

Despite all the discussion it still hasn't been added back. Even if an administrator added it back, how long would it be before the certain disruptive user removes it again? I believe it is all the same user, who probably added the link to random places, so it could get blacklisted and so that this very problem would erupt. If Smalljim was here, he would've reverted it by now. Jolly Ω Janner 16:35, 6 January 2009 (UTC)

Admins are not immune to the blacklist...we can't "just revert its removal" any more any non-admins or anonIP can. DMacks (talk) 18:17, 6 January 2009 (UTC)

That's a bummer. Is there any thing that we can add the URL to that means it can be added to only this article? Jolly Ω Janner 18:40, 6 January 2009 (UTC)

Yes, see WP:WHITELIST - MrOllie (talk) 17:26, 12 January 2009 (UTC)

Location

Couched within rapidly deleted demonstrations of a continuing inability to digest what's clearly written in the green box above, persons unknown seem to be making a single reasonable point. Google says the shopping mall is here, not quite where the article says it is. The part of the name of the graphic that seems to indicate location is (with spaces inserted to avoid the need for lateral scrolling): Point.latitude_e6=50371606 &Point.longitude_e6=4290829871 &Point.iconid=15&Point=e& latitude_e6=50371606& longitude_e6=4290829871. I'm not sure how to parse that; perhaps somebody else could have a bash at it. -- Hoary (talk) 15:35, 8 February 2009 (UTC)

What does this have to do with Misplaced Pages? Jolly Ω Janner 16:50, 8 February 2009 (UTC)

• Article meets criteria for inclusion based on in-depth mention in multiple reliable sources. It has already been through AfD discussion, where it was found to be viable and not an ad. Remember, WP isn't about how you perceive something in lay-language, but about how it relates to WP guidelines and policies. Please don't waste your time debating that...you'll need quite clear and convincing reasons how it is totally non-viable under those guidelines. DMacks (talk) 20:26, 8 February 2009 (UTC)

Additional to that, the original Drake Circus article was deleted via AfD because it was discovered that Drake Circus is not an official area and is just an area of streets with an unofficial nickname. Also it was decided that the area itself was not inherently notable based on WP's rules. Then add to that the amount of vandalism emanating from the local Student's Union (which is continuing based on the local BT Broadband owned IP addresses involved in ongoing trolling and disruption) it was deemed more convenient to redirect the Drake Circus article here. --WebHamster 21:05, 8 February 2009 (UTC)

Back to the subject: location

This thread has taken a very bizarre direction while I slept. I understand that thinking people among you have been distracted by whack-a-troll, but the very first response does seem directed at my original post, and the question What does this have to do with Misplaced Pages? puzzles me.

So I'll try again.

The article is of course about DCSC and has two location links for this. They're the same: 50°22′20″N 4°08′16″W / 50.37222°N 4.13778°W / 50.37222; -4.13778. I clicked on one of the pair. The page gave various options; I clicked on the Google Maps option. I was presented with a map with a pointer to a place I'll call A.

In another window, I went to DCSC's own website. It's a boring affair but I think it can be trusted to show where the place is. It has a "getting here" page, www.drakecircus.com/getting-here , which has a map (unfortunately stylized) that shows DCSC as at a place I'll call B. This is close to but not the same as A.

I then opened a third Window, and asked Google Maps where DCLC was. It gave me a map showing DCSC at B.

I infer that the article gives the wrong coordinates for its subject. And what this has to do with Misplaced Pages is misinformation.

I was so sleepy at 15:35 somebody-else's-time that I didn't notice that the complex filename does appear give the coordinates of a single point, viz 50.371606 -4.290829871. However, that's a considerable change of longitude and I can only infer that Google Maps is using some other reference point for its internal purposes. -- Hoary (talk) 00:06, 9 February 2009 (UTC)

The coordinates are out by a few metres. They're still ontop of the shopping centre. If you want to change it then go on Google Earth and get the coordinates yourself. Jolly Ω Janner 00:58, 9 February 2009 (UTC)

I am not familiar with Google Earth; you seem to be. I know next to nothing about this shopping mall other than what I read in this article; you seem to know it rather better. You think the coordinates are out by a few metres; please fix them. Thank you. -- Hoary (talk) 01:13, 9 February 2009 (UTC)

If 50°22′20″N 4°08′16″W / 50.37222°N 4.13778°W / 50.37222; -4.13778 is wrong for the shopping centre, what is right for it? -- Hoary (talk) 00:57, 9 February 2009 (UTC)

What seems to have been ignored by yet another of these anonymous PITAs is that apart from it being a short road, there is no official area called Drake Circus. DCSC probably isn't in DC but then nowhere is ither unless it's a building actually on the road called DC. It's just one more anonymous road in the North Hill, PL4 area of Plymouth. --WebHamster 01:06, 9 February 2009 (UTC)

I'm not asking about "Drake Circus" (whether official, real but unofficial, or entirely imagined). If you'd like to discuss that, Talk:Drake Circus seems to be the place. I'm merely asking about the location of this shopping mall. (Incidentally, it's usually not helpful to refer to people as PITAs, even when they're PITAs.) -- Hoary (talk) 01:19, 9 February 2009 (UTC)

These are the coordinates for the shopping centre... not for the more ambigous term of Drake Circus. Shopping centres are quite easy to spot on a map :) Anyway... my coordinates aren't out by a few metres, but I'll try and get it right in the centre. Jolly Ω Janner 01:19, 9 February 2009 (UTC)

Thank you in advance for any improvement you can make. -- Hoary (talk) 01:21, 9 February 2009 (UTC)

The mall is some 300 metres south of drake circus as any offical map will confirm. Google maps takes data from verifcation cards returned by local businesses. Whilst the marketing team of the mall have succeeded in fooling the niave into thinking their shops are in the more prosperous neighbour, these cards are posted and it is impossible for DrakeCircus the mall to bend or alter their results - hence why google maps is accurate.81.132.107.66 (talk) 02:35, 9 February 2009 (UTC)

I have a simple request for you, and should be grateful if you would answer it without reference to either Drake Circus or the evilness of the shopping mall, neither of which is of any concern here. The Misplaced Pages article now states that the mall is at 50°22′20″N 4°08′15″W; is this correct or is it not, and if it is not, can you please supply the correct coordinates. Thank you. -- Hoary (talk) 05:43, 9 February 2009 (UTC)

Drakes Circus SC on CompletelyRetail

It's been suggested an external link to http://www.completelyretail.co.uk/portfolio/BritishLand/scheme/Drake-Circus-Plymouth/index is not necessary. Given that the content comes directly from the landowner British Land not Kandahar estates and directly contradicts much of the information on the wiki i.e. it's more accurate and up-to-date I would have thought it was more than relevant but required to verify that the information available was correct. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Benparer (talk • contribs) 15:48, 28 May 2012 (UTC)

Blacklisted Links Found on the Main Page

Cyberbot II has detected that page contains external links that have either been globally or locally blacklisted. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed, or are highly innappropriate for Misplaced Pages. This, however, doesn't necessarily mean it's spam, or not a good link. If the link is a good link, you may wish to request whitelisting by going to the request page for whitelisting. If you feel the link being caught by the blacklist is a false positive, or no longer needed on the blacklist, you may request the regex be removed or altered at the blacklist request page. If the link is blacklisted globally and you feel the above applies you may request to whitelist it using the before mentioned request page, or request it's removal, or alteration, at the request page on meta. When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. The whitelisting process can take its time so once a request has been filled out, you may set the invisible parameter on the tag to true. Please be aware that the bot will replace removed tags, and will remove misplaced tags regularly.

Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:

• http://www.drakecircus.com

  Triggered by \bdrakecircus\.(?:com|net|org)\b on the local blacklist

If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.

From your friendly hard working bot.—cyberbot II _Online 19:01, 8 December 2013 (UTC)

 Resolved This issue has been resolved, and I have therefore removed the tag. No further action is necessary.—_{Talk to my owner:Online} 17:20, 6 September 2015 (UTC)== Blacklisted Links Found on Drake Circus Shopping Centre ==

Cyberbot II has detected links on Drake Circus Shopping Centre which have been added to the blacklist, either globally or locally. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed or are highly inappropriate for Misplaced Pages. The addition will be logged at one of these locations: local or global If you believe the specific link should be exempt from the blacklist, you may request that it is white-listed. Alternatively, you may request that the link is removed from or altered on the blacklist locally or globally. When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. Please do not remove the tag until the issue is resolved. You may set the invisible parameter to "true" whilst requests to white-list are being processed. Should you require any help with this process, please ask at the help desk.

Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:

• http://www.drakecircus.com

  Triggered by \bdrakecircus\.(?:com|net|org)\b on the local blacklist

If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.

From your friendly hard working bot.—_{Talk to my owner:Online} 11:53, 4 September 2015 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Drake Circus Shopping Centre. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070806110811/http://www.freshfields.com/news/dynamic/Pressrelease.asp?newsitem=609 to http://www.freshfields.com/news/dynamic/Pressrelease.asp?newsitem=609
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120529172053/http://www.britishland.com/index.asp?pageid=42 to http://www.britishland.com/index.asp?pageid=42&newsid=282

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:46, 13 September 2017 (UTC)

• Start-Class Shopping center articles
• Low-importance Shopping center articles
• Start-Class Devon articles
• Low-importance Devon articles
• WikiProject Devon articles