This is the current revision of this page, as edited by Cewbot (talk | contribs) at 15:34, 15 February 2024 (Maintain {{WPBS}}: 5 WikiProject templates. Keep majority rating "GA" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 4 same ratings as {{WPBS}} in {{WikiProject South Africa}}, {{WikiProject Netherlands}}, {{WikiProject United Kingdom}}, {{WikiProject British Empire}}.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
Revision as of 15:34, 15 February 2024 by Cewbot (talk | contribs) (Maintain {{WPBS}}: 5 WikiProject templates. Keep majority rating "GA" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 4 same ratings as {{WPBS}} in {{WikiProject South Africa}}, {{WikiProject Netherlands}}, {{WikiProject United Kingdom}}, {{WikiProject British Empire}}.)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Invasion of the Cape Colony article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Invasion of the Cape Colony has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||
| ||||||||||
A fact from this article appeared on Misplaced Pages's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on July 19, 2015.The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that a year after the successful British invasion of the Cape Colony in 1795, a Dutch reinforcement convoy was forced to surrender at the Capitulation of Saldanha Bay? | ||||||||||
Facts from this article were featured on Misplaced Pages's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on September 15, 2017, and September 15, 2020. |
This article is rated GA-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Naval battle or infantry?
comment removed from article:
NOT A NAVAL OPERATION MORE INFANTRY THAN ANYTHING. The Major Gordon may have been killed or suicided, his widow selling Merino Sheep to Naval Captains Waterhouse & Kent for shipping to Australia in january 1797, the first Merinos to Australia. Keith Dawson Toowoomba Qld nanke@gil.com.au Ps there is doubt about the Gordon as Waterhouse's letter to Sir Joseph Banks says Colonel Gordon. Only death I can find is William Augustus Gordona Major, he died in March 1796. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.94.40.2 (talk • contribs)
Possibly a consequence of the French Revolution
Hearsay or fact? William, Prince of Orange traded the Dutch settlement at the Cape of Good Hope in return for protection of the Dutch royalty following fear of French-incited revolution by the Dutch commoners or, as happened, a Napoleonic invasion of the Netherlands. The British sent a naval force to present the terms of the exchange, but were met with resistance because the Dutch settlers had not yet received news warning of the contract from the Netherlands.
The suicidee William Gordon refered to in the article above was the person after whom Gordons Bay was named.
Potion 12:26, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
I have Heard also that it was the threat of French conquest of Holland that spurred Brittan to take the cape.
Orangutanlibrarian 08:26 12 March 2010 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Orangutanlibrarian (talk • contribs) 18:30, 12 March 2010 (UTC)
Tidy Up
As part of a push for a Good Topic I will be tidying up a version of this article in my userspace over the next week or so. I note that aside from vandalism there has been no serious activity on this page for some time, but if any one has concerns, questions or comments please do get in touch. I may also redirect this article to a new title reflecting the fact that it covers the whole of the invasion, not just the (very small) Battle of Muizenberg (which in any other context would barely be a skirmish). Best--Jackyd101 (talk) 23:44, 11 June 2015 (UTC)
- I have now completed this tidy up, comprehensively expanding the article, completely resourcing it and making general improvements. I have also moved it - the article as it stood covered more than the minor skirmishing at Muizenberg anyway, and the new version covers the whole campaign. The redirect Battle of Muizenberg contains the article history for the article's previous incarnation. Any questions or comments, shoot them my way.--Jackyd101 (talk) 00:03, 14 June 2015 (UTC)
And it came to pass
I lived within a stone's throw of Muizenberg for thirty years. There is no pass at Muizenberg. Fire up Google Earth and have a butcher's. The nature of the natural defensive position at Muizenberg is complex, with steep slopes to the west and an exposed sandy beach to the east. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Captainbeefart (talk • contribs) 11:13, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
- Misplaced Pages good articles
- Warfare good articles
- Misplaced Pages Did you know articles that are good articles
- GA-Class military history articles
- GA-Class maritime warfare articles
- Maritime warfare task force articles
- GA-Class African military history articles
- African military history task force articles
- GA-Class British military history articles
- British military history task force articles
- GA-Class Dutch military history articles
- Dutch military history task force articles
- GA-Class European military history articles
- European military history task force articles
- GA-Class Early Modern warfare articles
- Early Modern warfare task force articles
- GA-Class South Africa articles
- Mid-importance South Africa articles
- WikiProject South Africa articles
- GA-Class Netherlands articles
- Netherlands main page DYK articles
- All WikiProject Netherlands pages
- GA-Class United Kingdom articles
- Mid-importance United Kingdom articles
- WikiProject United Kingdom articles
- GA-Class British Empire articles
- Mid-importance British Empire articles
- All WikiProject British Empire pages