This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Taxwoman (talk | contribs) at 21:14, 6 April 2007 (This article is referenced). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 21:14, 6 April 2007 by Taxwoman (talk | contribs) (This article is referenced)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Sexology and sexuality Redirect‑class | |||||||
|
merge to List of fetishes?
I wish to merge this article with the list of uncommon fetishes, this a stub and not be notable; any objections.--HoneymaneHeghlu meH QaQ jajvam 20:37, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
- I am opposed to such a merge. Why would combining this into a larger list article make any more sense? Unless the various articles in such lists are deeply interdependent, they should be split into multiple articles. Also, what do you mean by not notable? Uniform fetishism is a common occurrence. --Eyrian 20:41, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
- It's also a stub
with no sources. My mistake, it does have a source.--HoneymaneHeghlu meH QaQ jajvam 20:54, 24 February 2007 (UTC)- Just because it's a stub doesn't mean it should be dropped into a big list. --Eyrian 21:38, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
- oppose merge. Chris 05:00, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
- Just because it's a stub doesn't mean it should be dropped into a big list. --Eyrian 21:38, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
- It's also a stub
This article stands quite well on its own. Is there any reason to merge other than to justify having a List of fetishes?--Taxwoman 20:26, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
This article is referenced
The article, before it was converted to a redirect without any discussion, had two references. Were there any points in the article not covered by these references? If so, they should be properly flagged.--Taxwoman 21:14, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
Categories: