This is an old revision of this page, as edited by HagermanBot (talk | contribs) at 22:31, 8 April 2007 (MichaelJE2 didn't sign: "I appologise."). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 22:31, 8 April 2007 by HagermanBot (talk | contribs) (MichaelJE2 didn't sign: "I appologise.")(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)24 December 2024 |
|
Archives
Cataloging, Citing, ... 1
Dogs 1
Misc 1
Religion-Faith-Dialog-... 1
Science 1
Sockpuppets, Trolls, Harassment, ... 1
Lost week
Tail end of some issues, never got back about the murder things. Check out WP:TW I think you might like it SatuSuro 02:53, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
ASIN to OCLC
I noticed this edit on my watchlist. Thank you very much for your work, in almost all cases we probably never should have used an ASIN so I'm glad that someone is switching these out. --Gmaxwell 22:08, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
- You are most welcome! Some editors will probably also be annoyed. I'm finding that I do need to leave ASINs for AV material, such as here. Keesiewonder 22:16, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
Fact template
Hi, {{Fact}} needs a date= parameter. Was that what you meant? Rich Farmbrough, 23:04 30 March 2007 (GMT).
- Sorted (for that article). Special behaviour of infobox. Rich Farmbrough, 10:57 1 April 2007 (GMT).
Doug Skinner
I've edited the entry but wanted you to have a look over it before I remove the various tags. (Emperor 20:42, 31 March 2007 (UTC))
- OK cool. Tags have been removed. (Emperor 00:10, 2 April 2007 (UTC))
Science Collaboration of the Month
You voted for
Please help to improve it to match the quality of an ideal Misplaced Pages science article. |
NCurse work 19:45, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
Open solicitation for input/advice
Hello! There's been some recent activity getting the ball rolling at WikiProject Journalism, and if you'd like to join us, I'm sure your input would be valued. In particular, User:Wiki Wistah has proposed a guideline for editing articles about newspapers, and although I've responded with comments of my own, WW rightly suggested that it should be more than just a two-way conversation. I've noticed some of your own edits on related matters and thought you might be interested. Any suggestions would certainly be appreciated. Otherwise, if this is not of interest to you, or if you've already got a plateful of editing, feel free to ignore this message! -Tobogganoggin 01:55, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
I appologise.
I didn't notice. Thank you for showing me. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by MichaelJE2 (talk • contribs) 22:31, 8 April 2007 (UTC).