This is the current revision of this page, as edited by ClueBot III (talk | contribs) at 04:23, 13 April 2024 (Archiving 1 discussion to User talk:JohnWittle/Archive 1. (BOT)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
Revision as of 04:23, 13 April 2024 by ClueBot III (talk | contribs) (Archiving 1 discussion to User talk:JohnWittle/Archive 1. (BOT))(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)| User Page | User Talk | Contributions |
|---|
Dec 03 2014 Vandalism Warning
Hello, I'm 188.213.143.15. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! 188.213.143.15 (talk) 07:00, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:42, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
"Wings take dream" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Wings take dream. Since you had some involvement with the Wings take dream redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Hog Farm (talk) 20:05, 28 March 2020 (UTC)
Castle Doctrine, citation of Exodus 22:2 - 3
Hi Jesse, I'm doing research on the castle doctrine. I saw that you entered a variant of Exodus 22:2 - 3 which reads, "If a thief is caught breaking in and is struck so that he dies, the thief owes no blood-debt to the home-defender; but if the thief lives, he owes a blood-debt to the home-defender and must make restitution."
Can you tell me where you found this translation/interpretation of Exodus? I can't find it anywhere!
I also looked up Matthew Henry's Commentary on Exodus 22 on biblegateway.com, and it reads differently. "4. If a thief broke a house in the night, and was killed in the doing of it, his blood was upon his own head, and should not be required at the hand of him that shed it, Exod. 22:2. As he that does an unlawful act bears the blame of the mischief that follows to others, so likewise of that which follows to himself. A man’s house is his castle, and God’s law, as well as man’s, sets a guard upon it; he that assaults it does so at his peril. Yet, if it was in the day-time that the thief was killed, he that killed him must be accountable for it (Exod. 22:3), unless it was in the necessary defence of his own life. Note, We ought to be tender of the lives even of bad men; the magistrate must afford us redress, and we must not avenge ourselves." Do you have any info on the history of English readings of Exodus 22:2 - 3? Mako.Nagasawa.1972 (talk) 20:42, 11 April 2024 (UTC)