This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 2001:44c8:46b0:2a32:1:0:4ea0:d5b6 (talk) at 16:07, 28 April 2024 (-- de earste helte fan it). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 16:07, 28 April 2024 by 2001:44c8:46b0:2a32:1:0:4ea0:d5b6 (talk) (-- de earste helte fan it)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Skip to table of contents |
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the List of Misplaced Pages controversies article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4Auto-archiving period: 2 months |
The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information. |
This article was nominated for deletion. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination:
|
* - de earste helte fan it Frysk en it begjin fan it
Fram controversy was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 30 June 2019 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into List of Misplaced Pages controversies. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here. |
This article has not yet been rated on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article has been mentioned by a media organization:
|
Text has been copied to or from this article; see the list below. The source pages now serve to provide attribution for the content in the destination pages and must not be deleted as long as the copies exist. For attribution and to access older versions of the copied text, please see the history links below.
|
This article's edit history is not complete. Some of the article text's edit history exists at a different location due to copying and pasting between articles. This may be a violation of the CC BY-SA and/or GFDL if proper attribution was not made in an edit summary or on the talk page. Please see Misplaced Pages:Merge and Misplaced Pages:How to break up a page for details of when such copying and pasting is acceptable and when it is not, and how to correctly attribute using links in the edit summaries. You can also read the "copying within Misplaced Pages" guideline for an overview of the issues involved. |
Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
|
Redisgn
In early 2023, Misplaced Pages redesigned their site to punish competent professionals who still use desktop computers. The new design completely discards the old format for a new one that destroys the linearity of articles and implements reduced line length. The reduction in line length is intended to cater to those with poor reading comprehension, though they did not beta test the design on simple.wikipedia.org for an unknown reason.
I put this in talk so as to not get an IP ban from wikipedia.
Proposed merge
Alan Mcilwraith (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) is an unencyclopedic and mean-spirited biography of an obscure Misplaced Pages hoaxer. I suggest a minimal merge to the Misplaced Pages controversy list as an alternative to deletion. Cheers, gnu57 02:04, 27 July 2023 (UTC)
- I don't see how this is a controversy. Guy made his bed and will have to lie in it. EEng 02:42, 27 July 2023 (UTC)
- I don't know, it looks pretty well-referenced to me. It might be better off with some copyediting for tone, but I don't know about a merge. jp×g🗯️ 09:14, 17 November 2023 (UTC)
- There is not presently anything in the article connecting this person to Misplaced Pages, so no, it shouldn't be merged. I'm skeptical that we should even have such a bio... — Rhododendrites \\ 22:52, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Rambot an actual controversy?
I was surprised to see the story of Rambot listed as a controversy, as from what the article says about it the bot to me seemed primarily innovative and helpful. So I started looking around, and I could not find any public mention of the Rambot from before Mr Lih wrote about it in a book twelve years after the fact. Not a single public expression of anything, not of it being found controversial, nor of any public support for it. Nothing whatsoever before the publication of mr Lih's book, and also nobody else opining by themselves even after it's publication. Only references to Mr Lih's description.
What I did find however, was a lemma on Misplaced Pages about bot-history on the site, where it turned out similar bots were being used in several other-language wiki's concerning other countries' administrative divisions, around the same time as Rambot had been used (Misplaced Pages:History_of_Wikipedia_bots#Small_town_bots).
So with the benefit of hindsight I wonder: was the 2002 use of Rambot actually controversial simply because one person said so in 2014, even if that one person is a serious researcher and author? Or was it actually an innovative thing to do which was primarily accepted practice among the community as soon as it occurred?
I'm not gonna mess with the page, do not see myself as able to judge in this matter, and I am not a very experienced editor. But this listing just seemed weird/off to me. Jutte Brøtbørda (talk) 17:00, 8 September 2023 (UTC)
- All the discussions should still be here, although I will warn anyone who tries to delve into this that page histories start to get real shaky around 2002-01 (people were just discussing stuff on article pages themselves, comments weren't getting signed reliably, etc). It's totally possible that people were hopping mad about it, but it was far before my time. jp×g🗯️ 09:11, 17 November 2023 (UTC)
Add Misplaced Pages controversy about BFDI
Can anybody add a Misplaced Pages controversy about BFDI? Many BFDI articles were deleted on Misplaced Pages. 2001:448A:11A3:1155:51B1:ED4C:48D3:CB9F (talk) 17:14, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
- If you can find an independent, reliable source about it, then feel free to add it to the article. Jurta /he/they 17:39, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
- For the uninitiated, see WP:BFDI. jp×g🗯️ 09:09, 17 November 2023 (UTC)
Source 121
Source 121 under the false reporting of the deaths of Byrd and Kennedy doesn't fit the info of the source. Source 121's preview is a contemporary Fox News story, however clicking on the link goes to a 2021 Fox News story about Larry Sanger criticizing Misplaced Pages for supposed left wing bias. XCBRO172 (talk) 16:33, 30 October 2023 (UTC)
Categories:- Misplaced Pages controversial topics
- All unassessed articles
- Unassessed Internet culture articles
- Low-importance Internet culture articles
- WikiProject Internet culture articles
- Unassessed Websites articles
- Low-importance Websites articles
- Unassessed Websites articles of Low-importance
- Unassessed Computing articles
- Unknown-importance Computing articles
- All Computing articles
- All Websites articles
- Unassessed Misplaced Pages articles
- Mid-importance Misplaced Pages articles
- WikiProject Misplaced Pages articles
- List-Class List articles
- Low-importance List articles
- WikiProject Lists articles
- Misplaced Pages pages referenced by the press