This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Fahrenheit451 (talk | contribs) at 03:33, 13 April 2007 (→Fair Use links: created new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 03:33, 13 April 2007 by Fahrenheit451 (talk | contribs) (→Fair Use links: created new section)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Fahrenheit451 has been an active Misplaced Pages editor since March 3, 2005.
|
We've awarded you this PARC research star in recognition for your contribution to research about conflict in Misplaced Pages. Thank you for your help!!! --Parc wiki researcher 21:10, 10 August 2006 (UTC) |
|
 Fahrenheit451 for your Support! |
PS: YES YOU'RE RIGHT HARRY POTTER USES A BROOM! (BUT GOOD MOPS ARE HARD TO FIND!!)
|
The Purple Heart | |
| I, Smee, award this barnstar to Fahrenheit451 for getting a bad rap for being a good editor. Thank you. Smee 22:01, 5 March 2007 (UTC). |
A Short Guide to Office of Special Affairs Tactics on Misplaced Pages
Anyone who wishes to understand the lunacy of Church of Scientology-directed editors on Misplaced Pages should listen to the famous Monty Python Argument Clinic. Experience with these characters here has shown that:
- They may pretend to not understand the topic of a discussion.
- They may refuse to acknowledge the existence of verifiable data that conflicts with their point of view.
- They may falsely accuse you of a personal attack if you are able to defend your position, after they attempt to bait you.
- They may misrepresent Misplaced Pages policy and pretend their fabrications are true.
- They may attempt to change the subject of a thread if they have made a foolish statement (not uncommon) and the discussion has gone against them.
- They may ally themselves with Misplaced Pages policy makers in an attempt to change editing policy so as to make Scientology-related articles less disreputable.
- They may put nuisance comments on a discussion page, either overtly or anonymously.
- They troll discussion pages to stir up trouble.
The best solutions are to ignore or quickly end discussions with them as their malicious intentions are to waste your time and/or provoke you. Incidentally, the two Office of Special Affairs personnel presently in charge of internet related operations are Gloria Idda and Lynn Varney.
Fair Use links
A discussion with User:COFS
Just curious, COFS. How much data has been culled from your folders in answer to the question, "Have you done something that someone almost found out about?"--Fahrenheit451 02:31, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
- None. That does not read ;-) COFS 02:36, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
- You are not being truthful as OSA will not tell you what is culled and when. Your answer "That does not read" indicates some anxiety on the subject. Were you given a sec check by OSA to qualify to edit on wikipedia? --Fahrenheit451 02:43, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
- You talking like a master psychologist. I can almost see you index finger hysterically waving around. However, you are making personal comments and not good ones. I'll let that slide and take one myself. The answer is "no". And I might comment that you are pretty lunatic to think that. Over and out. COFS 02:48, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
- Are those images of my index finger hysterically waving around from an implant you have received? Where did that occur? Who would represent a master psychologist?--Fahrenheit451 03:02, 13 April 2007 (UTC)