This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 2601:280:c380:8120:240b:6635:18b2:ef3 (talk) at 19:29, 24 May 2024 (→A person who follows the diet is known as a vegan?). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 19:29, 24 May 2024 by 2601:280:c380:8120:240b:6635:18b2:ef3 (talk) (→A person who follows the diet is known as a vegan?)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff) view · edit Frequently asked questions
To view an answer, click the link to the right of the question. Q1: Why does the article distinguish between dietary and ethical vegans? Aren't ethical vegans the only true vegans? The article makes the distinction because reliable sources make it. See Talk:Veganism/Sources for the dietary veganism distinction for a selection of sources. For example:
|
This page is not a forum for general discussion about Veganism. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about Veganism at the Reference desk. |
This article is written in British English with Oxford spelling (colour, realize, organization, analyse; note that -ize is used instead of -ise) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
Veganism was one of the good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | ||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||
Current status: Delisted good article |
This level-4 vital article is rated B-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article has been mentioned by a media organization:
|
Archives |
Index 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20 |
Sources for ethical/dietary distinction |
This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
Critiques of Veganism
In the interests of fairness, shouldn't there be a section listing critiques and criticisms of the vegan diet from a health point of view at the very least? The only dissenting voice given in the article is from "Discrimination against vegans" and "Vegaphobia" which very strongly implies that only irrational and spiteful people would have any problem with this lifestyle. It just seems strange that nearly every other movement listed on this site follows a very standard formula of its history, its beliefs, and nearly always ends with a list of its criticisms written from a neutral point of view. Why should veganism be any different? 2603:3018:CD9:100:FC7B:A7D0:E465:4794 (talk) 03:19, 24 November 2023 (UTC)Phoenix
- Agree with this - personally I have no issue with vegans or veganism in general but it is odd that this article is basically uncritical. Foonblace (talk) 08:50, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
- From the lede: "Vitamin B12 supplementation is important because its deficiency can cause blood disorders and potentially irreversible neurological damage". In general, WP:CRITS are to be avoided. Bon courage (talk) 09:06, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
- Under the subheading “Philosophy, religion, or politics” WP:CRITS says:
- “For topics about a particular point of view – such as philosophies (Idealism, Naturalism, Existentialism), political outlooks (Capitalism, Marxism), or religion (Islam, Christianity, Atheism) – it will usually be appropriate to have a ‘Criticism’ section or ‘Criticism of ...’ subarticle. Integrating criticism into the main article can cause confusion because readers may misconstrue the critical material as representative of the philosophy's outlook, the political stance, or the religion's tenets.”
- Since veganism is both a dietary choice and a philosophy, maybe this applies here. Marippy (talk) 01:01, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
- I heard what you are saying, but in this case, the criticism should be incorporated into the article. I don't trust people to list criticisms from a neutral point of view... I think having a criticisms section would invite trolls to vandalize the article, which is something we do NOT want. Historyday01 (talk) 02:01, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
- I agree. Having a criticism section would invite the trolls and be very bad. Historyday01 (talk) 02:00, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
- From the lede: "Vitamin B12 supplementation is important because its deficiency can cause blood disorders and potentially irreversible neurological damage". In general, WP:CRITS are to be avoided. Bon courage (talk) 09:06, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
A person who follows the diet is known as a vegan?
There's actually another term for someone who follows the diet without following the philosophy: plant-based dieter. https://www.google.com/books/edition/The_Plant_Based_Diet_CookBook/eojPDwAAQBAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=%22plant+based+dieter%22&pg=PP10&printsec=frontcover Countryboy603 (talk) 15:45, 8 December 2023 (UTC)
- Plant-based diets can be meaty. Veganism is more plant-only. Bon courage (talk) Bon courage (talk) 15:49, 8 December 2023 (UTC)
- Someone who follows a plant-only diet but wears leather is a strict plant-based dieter, not a vegan. Is that book I linked to not a reliable source?--Countryboy603 (talk) 15:54, 8 December 2023 (UTC)
- Not really. See also Talk:Plant-based diet#Vegan diets (where you are mentioned). Bon courage (talk) 16:02, 8 December 2023 (UTC)
- @Countryboy603 No, that book is self-published. Possibly AI-generated. Pyrrho the Skipper (talk) 16:02, 8 December 2023 (UTC)
- Someone who follows a plant-only diet but wears leather is a strict plant-based dieter, not a vegan. Is that book I linked to not a reliable source?--Countryboy603 (talk) 15:54, 8 December 2023 (UTC)
- So why don't Misplaced Pages articles about veganism in other languages have this "particularly in diet" thing? The Spanish article translates to "Veganism is the attitude consisting of rejecting the use of products of animal origin, together with a doctrine or philosophy that rejects conceiving animals as merchandise, whether for clothing, medicines, cosmetics, transportation, experimentation, help at work or entertainment. Veganism is defined as a lifestyle, as an ethical position and as an ideology. Those who practice veganism are called vegans. The foundations of veganism include ethical, moral, environmental, health and humanitarian arguments. The products and services excluded by veganism are all those that involve an animal, for example in food (meat, fish, eggs, milk and derivatives, honey), in clothing and industry (leather, wool, furs and some cosmetics), entertainment - zoos , some pets, circuses -, or services - guide dogs, police dogs, hunting dogs, draft animals or animal experimentation, including medical experimentation."2601:280:C380:8120:240B:6635:18B2:EF3 (talk) 19:21, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
Merge
Should we merge this with Abolitionism (animal rights)? Countryboy603 (talk) 00:06, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
- Maybe link it but not completely merge 173.93.59.46 (talk) 05:06, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
- No.--C.J. Griffin (talk) 05:15, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
- No. Abolitionism and veganism are interrelated yet distinct philosophies. They complement each other. Rasnaboy (talk) 13:37, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
- This merge proposal is also discussed at Talk:Abolitionism_(animal_rights)#Merge. I oppose this merge. There are a number of RS sources that have significant coverage of Abolitionism as a concept, which alone is justification for a separate article.Dialectric (talk) 13:24, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
Prevalence by country: Germany, incorrect statement
...better educated (people who ended their formal education with Hauptschule graduation)...
In Germany, Hauptschule is not considered better educated. It's the lowest of the 3 schools kids attend starting 5th grade. 107.4.90.214 (talk) 23:57, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
- I deleted the part that goes into detail about education and East/West Germany. The study is too small to draw any of these conclusions. CarlFromVienna (talk) 09:48, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
- Misplaced Pages articles that use Oxford spelling
- Misplaced Pages articles that use British English
- Delisted good articles
- Former good article nominees
- B-Class level-4 vital articles
- Misplaced Pages level-4 vital articles in Everyday life
- B-Class vital articles in Everyday life
- B-Class Alternative views articles
- Mid-importance Alternative views articles
- WikiProject Alternative views articles
- B-Class Animal rights articles
- Top-importance Animal rights articles
- WikiProject Animal rights articles
- B-Class Food and drink articles
- High-importance Food and drink articles
- WikiProject Food and drink articles
- B-Class Effective Altruism articles
- Mid-importance Effective Altruism articles
- B-Class medicine articles
- Mid-importance medicine articles
- All WikiProject Medicine pages
- B-Class Veganism and Vegetarianism articles
- Top-importance Veganism and Vegetarianism articles
- WikiProject Veganism and Vegetarianism articles
- B-Class Philosophy articles
- Low-importance Philosophy articles
- B-Class ethics articles
- Low-importance ethics articles
- Ethics task force articles
- B-Class Contemporary philosophy articles
- Low-importance Contemporary philosophy articles
- Contemporary philosophy task force articles
- Misplaced Pages pages referenced by the press