This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 195.56.224.237 (talk) at 18:12, 15 April 2007 (rvv). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 18:12, 15 April 2007 by 195.56.224.237 (talk) (rvv)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Tag
The text of this article is not very well balanced and it is based to great degree on the information provided by HHRF, which is a Hungarian foundation protecting interests of the Hungarian minorities living abroad. They are far from being independent. Moreover, they are not supported by any major nongovernmental organization from outside Hungary, which is quite strange. I do not consider their website a credible and authoritative source and I tagged this article as non-compliant with the standards of Misplaced Pages until it cites only major credible sources that do not push a particular POV. Tankred 03:59, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
What if you would not call any source a POV, wich is not in Serbian or Slovak or not reflects your POV. You're maintaining a perfect double standard.
Tankred's lie #21030424000=
This is it: "A source added by a later banned user proved not to be accurate. Caplovic was not a deputy prime minister in 2002."
The incriminated section:
"Dusan Čaplovič, the vice-president of the Smer party, has called for the banning of singing the Hungarian national anthem in Catholic Churches, claiming that this is disloyal to Slovakia. Even Robert Fico, current prime minister and leader of the Smer party, has made controversial statements in this regard as well."
The section was moved from Anti-Hungarian sentiment here, by infed banned User:VinceB. Into that article, indef banned (for two month - LOL) User:Juro moved from Slovakization article. Into that article, the refences were added by User:Alphysikist , so as the whole section.
So:
- It was added by another user, User:Alphysikist , not a banned one.
- Not only references but the whole "section", if two lines can be called a section.
- The section does not claim that Caplovic was prime minister (or any similar). Nor mentioning 2002 or any date, and nor in that kind of a context.
- Tankred claimed many times before, that he's not speaking Hungarian, but here, claimes the sources are inaccurate. Well, they're not. http://www.stars21.com/ - a good page or text translator. for en-hu-en.
This is the problem, not User:VinceB (me). Speak nice, or die. --195.56.224.237 17:38, 15 April 2007 (UTC)