This is the current revision of this page, as edited by Nicfromthethrift (talk | contribs) at 01:53, 27 June 2024 (#talk-topic). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
Revision as of 01:53, 27 June 2024 by Nicfromthethrift (talk | contribs) (#talk-topic)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Golden Raspberry Awards article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 30 days |
This article is rated C-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Worst Golden Raspberry Awards by the year
2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024 and 2025 are Golden Raspberry awards for worst films and shouldn't watch it. 174.228.165.131 (talk) 00:30, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
History section verb use
The history section is filled with kind of weird verb phrases like "had been watching" and "started thinking." I feel like these sentences don't flow super well. Nicfromthethrift (talk) 01:53, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
Categories:- C-Class film articles
- C-Class film awards articles
- Film awards task force articles
- C-Class American cinema articles
- American cinema task force articles
- WikiProject Film articles
- C-Class awards articles
- Low-importance awards articles
- Awards articles
- C-Class Comedy articles
- Mid-importance Comedy articles
- WikiProject Comedy articles