Misplaced Pages

Talk:Ethnic conflict in Sri Lanka

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk | contribs) at 12:49, 10 July 2024 (Removed deprecated parameters in {{Talk header}} that are now handled automatically (Task 30)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

Revision as of 12:49, 10 July 2024 by Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk | contribs) (Removed deprecated parameters in {{Talk header}} that are now handled automatically (Task 30))(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Ethnic conflict in Sri Lanka redirect.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
Article policies
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3Auto-archiving period: 30 days 
The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information.
Articles for deletionThis article was nominated for deletion on 10 July 2012. The result of the discussion was keep and improve.
Articles for deletionThis article was nominated for deletion on 27 November 2012. The result of the discussion was keep.
Redirects for discussionThis redirect was nominated at Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion on 12 August 2012. The result of the discussion was article moved over the redirect.
This redirect does not require a rating on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects.
WikiProject iconSri Lanka Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Sri Lanka, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Sri Lanka on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Sri LankaWikipedia:WikiProject Sri LankaTemplate:WikiProject Sri LankaSri Lanka
MidThis redirect has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconPolitics
WikiProject iconThis redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics
WikiProject iconEthnic groups Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Ethnic groups, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles relating to ethnic groups, nationalities, and other cultural identities on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Ethnic groupsWikipedia:WikiProject Ethnic groupsTemplate:WikiProject Ethnic groupsEthnic groups
MidThis redirect has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject Ethnic groups open tasks:

Here are some open WikiProject Ethnic groups tasks:

Feel free to edit this list or discuss these tasks.


Replaced with redirect

It would be great if someone could construct a stub for this article. However, I think the best course of action in the mean time is to have a redirect. Thoughts? TippyGoomba (talk) 19:47, 2 June 2013 (UTC)

No, I'd recommend leaving this as a redirect; a stub will encourage user edits taking us down the same road. I've requested protection for the redirect to prevent this. I would recommend developing a stub/outline in the incubator so users can contribute to the new version there. Chris Troutman (talk) 20:10, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
That sounds good as well. TippyGoomba (talk) 21:11, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
Seems like some users had political motivation. Seems like no one interest to improve the document by a new structure. Reverting back to original since we can't wait our entire life to see a new structure for this article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 61.245.163.53 (talk) 16:10, 8 October 2013 (UTC)
If you want to write a fresh article, that would be great. The redirect is much better than the old article. TippyGoomba (talk) 06:08, 9 October 2013 (UTC)
Categories: