Talk:Elizabeth Edwards - Misplaced Pages

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk | contribs) at 17:47, 15 July 2024 (Removed deprecated parameters in {{Talk header}} that are now handled automatically (Task 30)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

Revision as of 17:47, 15 July 2024 by Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk | contribs) (Removed deprecated parameters in {{Talk header}} that are now handled automatically (Task 30))(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Skip to table of contents

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Elizabeth Edwards article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Misplaced Pages? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: Index, 1, 2Auto-archiving period: 30 days

Discussions on this page often lead to previous arguments being restated. Please read recent comments and look in the archives before commenting.

This article is rated B-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography: Politics and Government

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Misplaced Pages's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as Low-importance).

United States: North Carolina Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.

United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by WikiProject North Carolina (assessed as Mid-importance).

Women writers Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Westboro Baptist Church

One person gets to decide this isn't notable? I was willing to accept that at first and I went to the church own article, since there is a major counter-protest planned and the article has its own section on those.

I still have the radio on from Car Talk and I just heard an NPR reporter say "Elizabeth Edwards is a resident of Hell". (I just saw a columnist who says essentially that Fred Phelps will get to find that out firsthand.) And that she didn't ask God to cure her cancer (Oh, come now! She must have.) The article I just saw online said she was tolerant of gays; I can't remember now if NPR said that.

If NPR went into that much detail don't you think we're entitled to something here? If not, the Westboro article has it. For now.Vchimpanzee · talk · contributions · 18:13, 11 December 2010 (UTC)

I think the protest should have its own subsection in this article. Fox, CNN, ABC, WRAL, and many other local and national news stations have been covering it. Roughly 1000 people are expected to show up and block the view of the Westboro Baptist Church parishoners from the Edwards family. --Willthacheerleader18 (talk) 18:17, 11 December 2010 (UTC)

5 showed up, but yes, there's been enough standalone coverage of Westboro Baptists to warrant an inclusion: http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2010/12/11/national/main7140891.shtml Mosmof (talk) 01:25, 12 December 2010 (UTC)

← I reinstated mention of the protest, as it made no sense to talk only about a counterprotest without context, and the coverage of the Westboro threat was extensive before the funeral. But the details are unnecessary, given the fact that the threat was never realized. And no way this warrants anything more than a mention - in fact we might revisit this in a while to see if it remains notable. Tvoz/talk 08:42, 12 December 2010 (UTC)

Sounds fair.Vchimpanzee · talk · contributions · 23:54, 12 December 2010 (UTC)

Use of term "hate-group"

It does not seem very encyclopedic to term the church a "hate-group" because they oppose gay marriage. We may not agree with their views or tactics, but it seems childish and desperate to throw sticks and stones. Their actions should speak for themselves. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.62.85.141 (talk) 13:07, 19 December 2010 (UTC)

The phrase is referenced, and relevant. Also, please read the wikilinked article.Tvoz/talk 08:08, 29 December 2010 (UTC)

When you intrude on funerals and cause the family of the deceased to suffer in order to further your cause, that certainly qualifies as hate. Yes that phrase should stay in. -- 98.245.148.9 (talk) 09:21, 30 December 2010 (UTC)

They are not considered a "hate group" just because of their oppostiton to gay marriage. Look at the Westboro Baptist Church article. They publically hate the LGBT community, Hinduism, Islam, Judaism, Catholicism, Eastern Orthodoxy, Mainline Protestantism, the United States government, the United States military, and many other groups and organizations. (They also supposedly hate African Americans.. also, interupting funerals with signs that say "GOD HATES ___" shows that they are a "hate group", the term should stay in the article. --Willthacheerleader18 (talk) 21:49, 30 December 2010 (UTC)

What caused her breast cancer?

The article mentions she died of breast cancer but it doesn't give a suspected cause. I don't follow articles about her very much so I don't know the answer to this question, but doesn't fertility treatment run a risk of increased breast cancer??? If so, then wasn't her breast cancer possibly self-induced? I'm not a doctor - I don't know. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.161.38.27 (talk) 06:55, 3 January 2011 (UTC)

There is no evidence that fertility treatment can cause breast cancer. See risk factors of breast cancer. Jim Michael (talk) 05:55, 4 January 2011 (UTC)

Categories: