This is the current revision of this page, as edited by Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk | contribs) at 16:53, 17 July 2024 (Removed deprecated parameters in {{Talk header}} that are now handled automatically (Task 30)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
Revision as of 16:53, 17 July 2024 by Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk | contribs) (Removed deprecated parameters in {{Talk header}} that are now handled automatically (Task 30))(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Nuclear option article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2, 3Auto-archiving period: 6 months |
This article is rated Start-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Move to Nuclear option (United States Senate)
Hello, I think that the term "nuclear option" is very general, and using Nuclear option to describe this U.S. Senate procedure is undue. --167.58.214.170 (talk) 19:39, 16 June 2017 (UTC)
Riddled with Redunancies
This article contains multiple redundancies. For example, it refers to "simple majority" and "three-fifths majority." A majority is a majority. If a greater number of votes is required, that requirement is referred to as a "three-fifths vote" or a "two-thirds vote" respectively.Hansel von Schnitzel (talk) 15:31, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
Categories: