This is an old revision of this page, as edited by O.maximov (talk | contribs) at 11:21, 13 August 2024 (→Kelman's source characteristics: Reply). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 11:21, 13 August 2024 by O.maximov (talk | contribs) (→Kelman's source characteristics: Reply)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Kelman's source characteristics
New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- How to contribute
- Introduction to deletion process
- Guide to deletion (glossary)
- Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
- Kelman's source characteristics (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Doesn't appear to meet WP:N or have a good WP:ATD. Boleyn (talk) 15:22, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Advertising and Economics. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 15:38, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
- I am guessing it is based on this "Kelman’s source characteristics identify three characteristics of successful marketing communications sources: source credibility. source attractiveness. source power" https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10796-022-10349-3#:~:text=Kelman's%20source%20characteristics%20identify%20three,source%20power.. I think this can be made into an article or merged into an article on marketing communications. We should give a chance to the author to fix up. I will ping the author now. O.maximov (talk) 11:19, 13 August 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz 05:39, 2 August 2024 (UTC)- See https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&q=kelman+compliance+identification+internalization. It seems like this concept is pretty notable in the communications literature, with Kelman's original paper having over 6,000 citations. However, that doesn't change that this article needs to be renamed and rewritten from scratch (in my opinion). Mathwriter2718 (talk) 12:12, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz 05:55, 9 August 2024 (UTC)
- Delete This is quite mysterious. I am presuming that the 'kelman' here is Herbert Kelman. There is quite a bit about him in various sources and he is widely cited. However, this "theory" isn't mention in his article nor in the article on Marketing communications. It also isn't hardly found in G-scholar. A general web search shows that this seems to be a meme for marketing classes, but my guess is that someone other than him gave it this name. His own works are quite academic rather than "meme-y". So I say Delete and if someone editing either of the articles I mentioned decides to add this, that would be great. Lamona (talk) 03:15, 13 August 2024 (UTC)