This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Lowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs) at 19:31, 6 October 2024 (Archiving 1 discussion(s) to User talk:Fæ/2022) (bot). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 19:31, 6 October 2024 by Lowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs) (Archiving 1 discussion(s) to User talk:Fæ/2022) (bot)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
 Archives |
|
/2014 /2015 /2016 /2017 /2018 /2019 /2020 |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 7 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 2 sections are present. |
 | When I do reply it may be from a mobile phone or by email.  Due to routinely using public wifi, my edits will normally be via ToR to avoid browser hijacking. |
 | Fæ is busy and is going to be on Misplaced Pages in off-and-on doses, and may not respond swiftly to queries. |
Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Gillbert and Ellice Islands 1971.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Gillbert and Ellice Islands 1971.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Misplaced Pages may not meet the criteria required by Misplaced Pages:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Misplaced Pages:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Misplaced Pages policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.
If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Vanjagenije (talk) 23:05, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Good article reassessment for Burney Relief
Burney Relief has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 16:47, 5 October 2024 (UTC)