Misplaced Pages

Talk:Gaza War (2008–2009)

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by PARAKANYAA (talk | contribs) at 02:52, 22 October 2024 (→top: assess for wp crime, replaced: {{WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography| → {{WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography|importance=Low|). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

Revision as of 02:52, 22 October 2024 by PARAKANYAA (talk | contribs) (→top: assess for wp crime, replaced: {{WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography| → {{WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography|importance=Low|)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Skip to table of contents
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Gaza War (2008–2009) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
Article policies
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70Auto-archiving period: 14 days 
The Al Jazeera images have the logo because the Creative Commons license requires it.
These are free images with an attribution restriction.
For previously archived Lead section material: Archive 22 and 23
Sources for the article can be found at this subpage.
The inclusion of Operation Cast Lead and Gaza Massacre in the lead of the article is discussed in this RFC.
Censorship warningMisplaced Pages is not censored.
Images or details contained within this article may be graphic or otherwise objectionable to some readers, to ensure a quality article and complete coverage of its subject matter. For more information, please refer to Misplaced Pages's content disclaimer regarding potentially objectionable content and options for not seeing an image.
Discussions on this page often lead to previous arguments being restated. Please read recent comments and look in the archives before commenting.
In the newsA news item involving Gaza War (2008–2009) was featured on Misplaced Pages's Main Page in the In the news section on the following dates:
Misplaced Pages
Misplaced Pages
This article is rated B-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject iconIsrael Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Israel, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Israel on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IsraelWikipedia:WikiProject IsraelTemplate:WikiProject IsraelIsrael-related
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
Project Israel To Do:

 Here are some tasks awaiting attention:
WikiProject iconCrime and Criminal Biography: Terrorism Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Crime and Criminal Biography articles on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Crime and Criminal BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyCrime-related
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the Terrorism task force (assessed as High-importance).
WikiProject iconPalestine High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Palestine, a team effort dedicated to building and maintaining comprehensive, informative and balanced articles related to the geographic Palestine region, the Palestinian people and the State of Palestine on Misplaced Pages. Join us by visiting the project page, where you can add your name to the list of members where you can contribute to the discussions.PalestineWikipedia:WikiProject PalestineTemplate:WikiProject PalestinePalestine-related
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconMilitary history: Middle East
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history
B checklist
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
  1. Referencing and citation: criterion met
  2. Coverage and accuracy: criterion met
  3. Structure: criterion met
  4. Grammar and style: criterion met
  5. Supporting materials: criterion met
Associated task forces:
/ 
Taskforce icon
Middle Eastern military history task force
WikiProject iconIsrael Palestine Collaboration
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of the WikiProject Israel Palestine Collaboration, a collaborative, bipartisan effort to improve Misplaced Pages's coverage of the Israeli–Palestinian conflict. For guidelines and a participants list see the project page. See also {{Palestine-Israel enforcement}}, the ArbCom-authorized discretionary sanctions, the log of blocks and bans, and Working group on ethnic and cultural edit wars. You can discuss the project at its talk page.Israel Palestine CollaborationWikipedia:WikiProject Israel Palestine CollaborationTemplate:WikiProject Israel Palestine CollaborationIsrael Palestine Collaboration
Media mentionThis article has been mentioned by a media organization:
This article has previously been nominated to be moved. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination.
Logs and discussions:

Discussions:

  • Title discussion: 30 December 2008, discussion; 30 December 2008, discussion; 3 January 2009, discussion
  • RM, Multiple options, discussion continued, 4 January 2009, discussion
  • RM, Multiple options, discussion continued, 4 January 2009, discussion
  • RM, 2008–2009 Israel–Gaza conflict → Multiple options, no action, 10 January 2009, discusssion
  • Further title discussions: 13 January 2009, discussion; 15 January 2009, discussion; 16 January 2009, discussion; 22 January 2009, discussion; 29 January 2009, discussion
  • RM, 2008–2009 Israel–Gaza conflict → Israel–Gaza war, no consensus, 5 February 2009, discusssion
  • RM preparatory discussion: 11 February 2009, discussion
  • RM, 2008–2009 Israel–Gaza conflict → Gaza war, no consensus, 26 February 2009, discussion
  • Further title discussions: 3 March 2009, discussion
  • RM, 2008–2009 Israel–Gaza conflict → Operation Cast Lead, no move, 6 March 2009, discussion
  • Further title discussions: 5 April 2009, discussion; 30 April 2009, discussion
  • RM, 2008–2009 Israel–Gaza conflict → Gaza War, moved, 6 May 2009, discussion
  • Further title discussions: 20 May 2009, discussion; 28 May 2009, discussion; 21 August 2010, discussion; 23 December 2010, discussion; 24 June 2011, discussion
  • RM, Gaza War → Operation Cast Lead, no consensus, 20 March 2012, discussion
  • Further title discussion: 10 March 2015, discussion; 26 July 2015, discussion
  • RM, Gaza War (2008–2009) → 2008–2009 Gaza War, no consensus, 22 March 2021, discussion
  • RM, Gaza War (2008–2009) → 2008–2009 Gaza conflict or 2008–2009 Gaza incursion, not moved, 21 May 2021, discussion
  • RM, Gaza War (2008–2009) → 2008–2009 Gaza War, not moved, 14 October 2023, discussion
Warning: active arbitration remedies

The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article is related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, which is a contentious topic. Furthermore, the following rules apply when editing this article:

  • You must be logged-in and extended-confirmed to edit or discuss this topic on any page (except for making edit requests, provided they are not disruptive)
  • You may not make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on any edits related to this topic

Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Misplaced Pages, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.

Further information
The exceptions to the extended confirmed restriction are:
  1. Non-extended-confirmed editors may use the "Talk:" namespace only to make edit requests related to articles within the topic area, provided they are not disruptive.
  2. Non-extended-confirmed editors may not create new articles, but administrators may exercise discretion when deciding how to enforce this remedy on article creations. Deletion of new articles created by non-extended-confirmed editors is permitted but not required.

With respect to the WP:1RR restriction:

  • Clear vandalism of whatever origin may be reverted without restriction. Also, reverts made solely to enforce the extended confirmed restriction are not considered edit warring.
  • Editors who violate this restriction may be blocked by any uninvolved administrator, even on a first offence.

After being warned, contentious topics procedure can be used against any editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Misplaced Pages, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process. Contentious topic sanctions can include blocks, topic-bans, or other restrictions.
Editors may report violations of these restrictions to the Arbitration enforcement noticeboard.

If you are unsure if your edit is appropriate, discuss it here on this talk page first. When in doubt, don't revert!
WARNING
In accordance with Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration/Palestine-Israel articles#Discretionary sanctions, editors of this article are restricted to 1 revert per 24 hours. Violations of this restriction will lead to blocks.
This topic contains controversial issues, some of which have reached a consensus for approach and neutrality, and some of which may be disputed. Before making any potentially controversial changes to the article, please carefully read the discussion-page dialogue to see if the issue has been raised before, and ensure that your edit meets all of Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines. Please also ensure you use an accurate and concise edit summary.
          Other talk page banners
A fact from this article was featured on Misplaced Pages's Main Page in the On this day section on December 27, 2015 and December 27, 2018.

Hamas claims of casualties

Hamas never said that 600-700 of its members died. The Haaretz article in fact quotes Hamas as saying 200-300 Al-Qassam brigades members died, but also quotes Hamas saying 49 of its members died. It also quotes "250 killed" at the police station, but these are not strictly from Hamas, nor is it clear if they are combatants at all. It also quotes an additional 150 security personnel, and again its not clear if they were combatants in the Gaza war or not.VR (Please ping on reply) 02:39, 27 January 2024 (UTC)

Al-Qassam Brigades actively works with Hamas, but is not Hamas. In fact, it was originally part of Fatah. Here, I think Hamas is just specifying the number of combatants each group lost, rather than contradicting itself.

Israel considers police and security officers to be combatants if they enter combat when they're on duty -- regardless of whether they're Israeli or Palestinian. As far as I've been able to tell, Hamas doesn't count them as combatants even if they enter combat and are on duty.

Just came across this today:

"To deconstruct these figures properly, the status of the Gaza police must first be considered, since approximately 250 of them were among those listed as 'civilians' who were killed. Although the Goldstone Report concludes that the Gaza police force was a 'civilian law-enforcement agency,' there is overwhelming evidence to suggest otherwise.

"The Gaza police has its origins in the Hamas Executive Force. When the Executive Force was formed in 2006, its commander announced that the force was 'the nucleus of the future Palestinian army. The resistance must continue. We have only one enemy. They are Jews. We have no other enemy. I will continue to carry the rifle and pull the trigger whenever required to defend my people.' According to the report, the Executive Force merged with a reorganized PA police in October 2007.

"Despite the fact that the Executive Force no longer technically exists, during Operation Cast Lead a police spokesman said, 'Police officers received clear orders from the leadership to face the enemy, if the Gaza Strip were to be invaded.' This is conclusive evidence that the Gaza police were not entitled to the protections accorded to civilians in war. In addition, evidence suggests many policemen were combatant individuals regardless of their connection with the police.

"According to one count, 91% of the policemen killed were either members of a terrorist organization or in infantry training, with a 'decisive majority' of casualties belonging to military wings.

"In any event, reasonable people can and do disagree as to the status of the Gaza policemen killed by Israel. they cannot simply be lumped together with infants and other obvious non-combatants for purposes
of listing the number of dead civilians." Oakling (talk) 06:39, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
Forgot to ping: @VR Oakling (talk) 06:41, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
@Oakling: Sorry for the delay. The source you cited seems to be a WP:SELFPUB work by two authors known to be pro-Israel advocates. There are a few misleading claims here:
  • "The Gaza police has its origins in the Hamas Executive Force."
    • What the police used to be has no relevance. We know that Hersh Goldberg-Polin used to serve in the IDF, but given his IDF service ended in Apr 2023, he was rightfully considered civilian on Oct 7.
  • "According to one count, 91% of the policemen killed were either members of a terrorist organization"
    • Well, yes. According to Israel all Hamas members are considered terrorist, yet we know that Hamas also runs the civilian aspects of Gaza.
  • "Police officers received clear orders from the leadership to face the enemy, if the Gaza Strip were to be invaded."
    • This appears to be a misleading translation. The man who made these instructions clarified "Mr. Shahwan stated that the instructions given at that meeting were to the effect that in the event of a ground invasion, and particularly if the Israeli armed forces were to enter urban settlements in Gaza, the police was to continue its work of ensuring that basic food stuffs reached the population, of directing the population to safe places, and of upholding public order in the face of the invasion. Mr. Shahwan further stated that not a single policeman had been killed in combat during the armed operations, proving that the instructions had been strictly obeyed by the policemen." Goldstone report (416)
    • Further, the Goldstone report notes that 75% of police had been killed in a surprise Israeli attack before the ground invasion began.
  • Further, "the Mission notes that there are no allegations that the police as an organized force took part in combat during the armed operations" (417). Indeed Dershowitz doesn't provide any specific examples of police taking part in combat.
Other RS consider the police to be civilians, for example Is There a Court for Gaza? (page 588) and Karma Chavez.VR (Please ping on reply) 02:15, 2 September 2024 (UTC)

After the Hamas election in 2006, they rejected the recognition of Israel, but offered a 10 year truce, or Hudna

Typically covering 10 years, a hudna is recognised in Islamic jurisprudence as a legitimate and binding contract. A hudna extends beyond the Western concept of a cease-fire and obliges the parties to use the period to seek a permanent, non-violent resolution to their differences.

Why the Hamas charter isn’t a key obstacle to peace with Israel (theconversation.com)(source)

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2006/nov/01/israel

This is vital information on the events leading to the Siege of Gaza in 2007. The offer of Hudna should be inserted in this article in the third paragraph of the Background section, after "Hamas rejected..." Bill Shortell (talk) 16:23, 27 January 2024 (UTC)

Sources? Slatersteven (talk) 16:26, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Please phrase this as a request to change X to Y in the article and provide suitable sources, per WP:ARBECR, thanks. Selfstudier (talk) 16:26, 27 January 2024 (UTC)


Don't include Al-Aqsa Martyrs' Brigades under Fatah in infobox

Al-Aqsa Martyrs' Brigades separated from Fatah in 2008, prior to this conflict. Fatah should not be in the belligerents column, at least not as a parent organization of Al-Aqsa. Bill3602 (talk) 23:03, 28 February 2024 (UTC)

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 4 August 2024

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

This edit is correct, but could someone add the following word in bold, which is gramatically more correct?:

Most right-wing opposition parties, including Likud, etc, etc, etc

Thanks--37.212.89.252 (talk) 19:58, 4 August 2024 (UTC)

 Done Left guide (talk) 00:12, 5 August 2024 (UTC)

First Gaza War

I propose adding "First Gaza War" as an alternative name for this conflict. I had added it, with supporting references, but was reverted by Slatersteven. I didn't think this would have needed consensus before being added. It's a minor addition, it's properly-referenced (and there are many other references that could be added), and the name is used more often recently to distinguish this war from the other Gaza wars. – Asarlaí 10:22, 27 September 2024 (UTC)

Do any RS call it this? Slatersteven (talk) 10:25, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
Huh? I added three RS's in my edit. – Asarlaí 10:27, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
Sorry, but it does not alter the fact, this should not have been done without consensus. Slatersteven (talk) 10:34, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
Sorry, I didn't notice the hidden message when making my edit. I should've looked more carefully.
Aside from that, do you oppose "First Gaza War" being in the article like this as an alternative name? – Asarlaí 13:00, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
No, I just happen to think the rules apply to everyone, even if I agree with them. Slatersteven (talk) 13:15, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
Categories: