Misplaced Pages

talk:WikiProject Pedophilia Article Watch - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by Cewbot (talk | contribs) at 21:38, 24 October 2024 (Maintain {{WPBS}}: 1 WikiProject template. Create {{WPBS}}. (Category:WikiProject banners without banner shells)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

Revision as of 21:38, 24 October 2024 by Cewbot (talk | contribs) (Maintain {{WPBS}}: 1 WikiProject template. Create {{WPBS}}. (Category:WikiProject banners without banner shells))(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
This project page does not require a rating on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject iconPedophilia Article Watch (defunct)
WikiProject iconThis page is within the scope of WikiProject Pedophilia Article Watch, a project which is currently considered to be defunct.Pedophilia Article WatchWikipedia:WikiProject Pedophilia Article WatchTemplate:WikiProject Pedophilia Article WatchPedophilia Article Watch

To-do list for Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Pedophilia Article Watch: edit · history · watch · refresh · Updated 2019-02-26


Here are some tasks awaiting attention:
  • Cleanup : Restructure of WP:PAW for clarity and flow. In Progress SKay (talk) 12:10, 26 February 2019 (UTC)
  • Maintain : Maintain Watchlist as necessary.
  • Verify : Verify Articles utilizing the PAW banner are appropriate. Talk pages that include the PAW Project banner may be viewed here.

Watchlist

ViewShow Recent Changes


Archives
1, 2, 3, 4, 5

Talk page archive of obsoleted subpage "Terminology" - circa 2006


This page has archives. Sections older than 10 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III.

Good article reassessment for Jacobson v. United States

Jacobson v. United States has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 19:09, 5 July 2024 (UTC)

Category: